PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7135852

Pattern-evoked potentials and Bloch's law.

Abstract

Experiments are described which show that the latencies, unlike the amplitudes, of the C1 and C2 components of the human pattern-onset VEP do not conform to the contrast equivalent of Bloch's law. Whereas each component's amplitude is linearly related to the log of the (contrast X duration) product below a critical duration of 50 msec, its latency is independent of the stimulus pattern's duration and determined by its contrast alone; increasing by 30-35 msec for a 1.4 log unit contrast decrease. The relationship between these results and corresponding single-unit findings in the cat is discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M J Musselwhite, D A Jeffreys. 1982. Pattern-evoked potentials and Bloch's law.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(82)90026-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) applied over the occipital pole can suppress visual perception. Since its first description in 1989 by Amassian et al., this technique has widely been used to investigate visual processing at the cortical level. This article presents a review of experiments masking visual stimuli by TMS. The psychophysical characterization of TMS masking, the dependence on stimulus onset asynchrony between visual stimulus and TMS pulse, and the topography of masking within the visual field are considered. The relation between visual masking and the generation of phosphenes is discussed as well as the underlying physiological mechanisms.

Evoked Potentials, Visual↗