PubMed · 7151160
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A Oriol, C Crexells, M Riudor, F Garcia. 1982. Catheterization complications.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1810080616
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the incremental prognostic value, the role in risk stratification, and the impact on patient management of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in a population of patients without prior myocardial infarction, catheterization, or revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 2200 consecutive patients who at the time of their dual-isotope SPECT had not undergone catheterization, coronary artery bypass surgery, or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and had no known history of previous myocardial infarction. Follow-up was performed at a mean of 566 +/- 142 days (97% complete) for hard events (cardiac death and myocardial infarction) and for referral to cardiac catheterization or revascularization within 60 days after nuclear testing. Examination of clinical, exercise, and nuclear models by use of pre-exercise tolerance test (ETT), post-ETT, and nuclear information using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that nuclear testing added incremental prognostic value after inclusion of the most predictive clinical and exercise variables (global chi2 = 12 for clinical variables; 31 for clinical + exercise variables; 169 for nuclear variables; gain in chi2, P < .0001 for all; receiver-operating characteristic areas: 0.66 +/- 0.04 for clinical, 0.73 +/- 0.04 for clinical + exercise variables, 0.87 +/- 0.03 for nuclear variables, P = .03 for gain in area with exercise variables; P < .001 for increase with nuclear variables). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that scan information contributed 95% of the information regarding referral to catheterization with further additional information provided by presenting symptoms and exercise-induced ischemia. Referral rates to early catheterization and revascularization paralleled the hard event rates in all scan categories - very low referral rates in patients with normal scans and significant increases in referral rates as a function of worsening scan results. Even after stratification by clinical and exercise variables such as the Duke treadmill score, pre- and post-ETT likelihood of coronary artery disease, presenting symptoms, sex, and age, the nuclear scan results further risk-stratified the patient subgroups, thus demonstrating clinical incremental value. CONCLUSIONS: In a patient population with no evidence of previous coronary artery disease at overall low risk (1.8% hard event rate), myocardial perfusion SPECT adds incremental prognostic information and risk-stratifies patients even after clinical and exercise information is known. It appears that referring physicians use this test in an appropriate manner in selecting patients to be referred to catheterization or revascularization.
OBJECTIVES: The free epigastric artery bypass graft is proposed as an alternative conduit to the saphenous vein graft, known for its high rate of attrition. The aim of our study was to assess its endothelial function in vivo. BACKGROUND: The endothelium of arterial bypass grafts plays a role in both the performance and the patency of such grafts. METHODS: We studied 73 epigastric grafts early (mean +/- SD 10 +/- 3 days) and 36 late (12 +/- 5 months) after coronary bypass surgery with quantitative angiography at rest, after 2 min of atrial pacing (130 beats/min) and after injection of isosorbide dinitrate (1 to 2 mg) into the graft. RESULTS: At rest, mean epigastric graft diameter was lower in the late than in the early postoperative period (2.26 +/- 0.39 vs. 2.61 +/- 0.49 mm, p < 0.001). Early after operation, epigastric grafts with a small or an intermediate runoff, but not those with a large runoff, were capable of vasodilation with nitrates (+0.09 +/- 0.10 mm). Late after operation, vasodilation after administration of isosorbide dinitrate was similar in epigastric grafts with a large runoff and in those with a small or intermediate runoff (+ 0.23 +/- 0.09 vs. +0.23 +/- 0.18 mm). Significant vasodilation during pacing was observed late (+4 +/- 9%, p < 0.01) but not early postoperatively, except in a subset of patients with grafts capable of vasodilation after nitrates. A correlation between the response to nitrates and the response during pacing was observed early (r = 0.579, p < 0.001) and late postoperatively (r = 0.530, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Flow-mediated vasodilation during pacing was observed in most epigastric grafts late, but not early, after operation. This endothelium-dependent dilation was correlated with the importance of the vasodilation observed with nitrates (endothelium-independent), which was related to the importance of the runoff only in the early postoperative period. The ability of epigastric grafts late postoperatively to dynamically adapt their dimensions to an acute increase in demand could contribute to the good functional results of this new alternative arterial graft.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.