PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7163195

Microevolution and migration in the Pacific.

Abstract

Archaeological, linguistic, and ethnocultural studies suggest the Pacific was colonized by two, or possibly three, genetically distinct groups of people. Australoids moved first into New Guinea and Australia, followed by Papuan-speaking people, who penetrated as far as Santa Cruz in the Solomons. Austronesian speakers began their migrations 6,000 years ago and mixed with preexisting populations to a varying extent until they finally reached the unpopulated islands. Here, in Samoa and Tonga, they developed the cradle of Polynesian culture, which spread to the central Pacific and from there north to Hawaii and west to New Zealand. Detailed genetic studies have indicated that, in New Guinea, geographical propinquity is an important determinant of genetic similarity between populations. A wider survey indicates, however, that Austronesian speakers have more in common, despite great geographical separation than is true for Papuan speakers. In the Banks and Torres Islands and the Solomons, Polynesian "Outliers" can be differentiated from other Melanesian island populations, while for the Pacific as a whole it is shown that Amerindian populations cluster with north Mongoloids and Polynesian populations cluster with south Mongoloids, with Australian Aborigines and New Guinea Papuans maintaining separate identities. It is concluded that Polynesians originated from a south Mongoloid population, losing a number of specific marker genes along their migratory path, and becoming modified genetically before establishing themselves in the Polynesian centre of dispersal.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R L Kirk. 1982. Microevolution and migration in the Pacific.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7163195/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Whole genome characterisation of Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 'μVar' like variants over time.

Ostreid herpesvirus 1 (OsHV-1) is a major pathogen of Pacific oysters (Magallana gigas), linked to mass mortality events worldwide and presents a substantial threat to global aquaculture. Since 2010, mortality events have been occurring in Pacific oysters within Australia with the cause being an OsHV-1 microvariant highly similar to OsHV-1 μVar first detected in France, 2008. In this study, fifteen OsHV-1 whole genomes were assembled from Australian and New Zealand mortality events, including twelve newly sequenced genomes and three assembled from public datasets. Whole-genome phylogenetic analyses indicate that Australian and New Zealand OsHV-1 isolates form a distinct clade, separate from European and East Asian genomes, and with moderate regional and temporal divergence across the past 14 years. Across the dataset, multiple biologically relevant mutations were observed in genes of known function, including DNA polymerase, ribonucleotide reductase subunits, and apoptosis-related proteins, though most mutations occurred in uncharacterised genes. These findings highlight the limitations of single-gene typing and support the need for whole-genome approaches in understanding OsHV-1 evolution. Critically, the lack of recent whole-genome data, particularly from East and Southeast Asia, restricts the ability to trace viral origins and detect novel variants, underscoring the need for expanded global OsHV-1 genomic surveillance.

Australia↗

Interest holder-driven research priorities in sexual and reproductive health for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and prioritise sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults in Australia using a priority setting partnership approach. METHODS: A James Lind Alliance priority setting partnership was conducted with 92 interest holders: 31 youth from migrant and refugee backgrounds and 61 professionals (healthcare providers, researchers, policymakers and community leaders), recruited online and in-person. The priority setting partnership process included a rapid evidence scan, an online uncertainty survey, evidence verification, interim prioritisation and a final consensus workshop. RESULTS: Eighty-three research uncertainties yielded 11 final priorities across four sexual and reproductive health domains: sexual and reproductive health literacy, sexual violence prevention, accessible services and maternal health. A striking divergence emerged between youth and professional priorities only 3 achieved combined high-priority consensus. Youth prioritised a broader range of topics, including abortion access (rated high by youth but low by professionals), while professionals prioritised fewer areas. Two priorities achieved consensus: community-based maternal health support and barriers to reporting gender-based violence. CONCLUSION: This is the first priority setting partnership to identify sexual and reproductive health research priorities for migrant and refugee youth in Australia and to uniquely highlight substantial misalignment between youth and professional priorities. IMPLICATIONS FOR PUBLIC HEALTH: These identified priorities provide a foundation for targeted research, culturally responsive policy and more equitable sexual and reproductive health service provision for migrant and refugee adolescents and young adults.

Australia↗