PubMed · 7175893
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
C B Collier. 1982. Epidural blood-patching.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7175893/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Approximately 6,000 to 7,000 orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) procedures are performed annually, which require the administration of large volumes of blood products. Thus liver transplantation can significantly strain local and regional blood resources at a time when transfusion practices are changing dramatically, in large part because of anxiety caused by the human immunodeficiency virus. Intraoperative autologous transfusion has been proposed as a means of both reducing transfusion demands and lessening the hazards of allogeneic transfusion. However, the cost effectiveness of intraoperative blood salvage has not been unequivocally determined. We retrospectively examined the cost of intraoperative autologous transfusion during OLT for a 2-year period at the University of Cincinnati Hospital. A direct comparison was made between the charge for autologous transfusion and the calculated cost of allogeneic transfusion. Seventy OLT procedures were performed during the years 1993-1994. The average charge for autologous transfusion was $1,048.73 per case. Cell-salvage volumes for all cases were added, and the calculated conservation of allogeneic packed red blood cells totaled 359.6 units, worth $30,026.60 or $428.95 per case. The break-even point is approximately 12.6 units, and most patient do not receive this volume of salvaged blood. In fact, cell salvage reached cost equivalence in only three cases (4.8%). Moreover, the cost deficit of autologous transfusion during this 2-year period averaged $586.56 per case.
PURPOSE: To report our clinical experience with a new blood processing device which uses ultrafiltration. We assessed safety and efficacy by evaluating: 1 ) the quality and the quantity of intraoperative shed blood processed and reinfused to the patient 2) homologous blood requirements 3) clinical status of the patient post-transfusion. METHODS: With Ethics Committee approval, the ultrafiltration device was used in six consenting patients undergoing major elective spinal surgery. Blood samples for haematology and biochemistry tests were collected from patients post-induction of anaesthesia (baseline), 1 hr and 24 hr post-autotransfusion. Volumes of blood collected and processed, and all autologous and homologous transfusions were recorded. Patients were assessed post-operatively for any adverse effects. RESULTS: Five patients had donated blood preoperatively. One patient required homologous blood products in addition to autologous blood. In two patients, the filtration cartridge became blocked and required changing midprocessing. No patient sustained device-related complications. One patient had postoperative haematuria which resolved spontaneously within two hours. CONCLUSION: The ultrafiltration device was safe and effective in reducing homologous blood requirements in six patients undergoing elective spinal surgery. Further evaluation of the ultrafiltration device will be necessary, especially in view of the blockage of the filtration cartridge.