PubMed · 7186830
Synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable microsutures: a histological comparison.
Abstract
The increasing usage of microsurgery in gynaecology and the recent release of a synthetic absorbable microsuture prompted a comparative study between this material and a nonabsorbable microsuture. Ethilon and Coated Vicryl sutures (Ethicon Inc.) were inserted into rabbit uteri and the histological response compared at 35 and 70 days using both light and polarizing microscopy. The results indicated that although the predominating cell types differed, the overall histological sequelae were markedly less with the synthetic absorbable suture than with the nonabsorbable suture materials.
Explore related subjects
Keep this discovery
Explore connections, maps & timelines
G L Driscoll, P J Baird, P J Merkelbach, D H Smith. 1982. Synthetic absorbable and nonabsorbable microsutures: a histological comparison.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7186830/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.