Human memory and the information-processing metaphor.

The present study was designed to evaluate whether fixation point offsets have the same effects on the average latencies of prosaccades (responses towards target) and antisaccades (responses away from target). Gap and overlap conditions were run with and without an acoustic warning signal. The 'gap effect' was taken to be the difference in mean reaction time between gap and overlap trials. This effect was dramatically reduced by the presentation of the warning signal. Without this signal, fixation offsets can serve as warning signals themselves, which artifactually inflates the magnitude of the gap effect. The warning effect of fixation offsets was equivalent for pro and antisaccades. A significant gap effect is still evident with the acoustic warning signal; however, in this case it is associated primarily with prosaccades. These results replicate and extend our previous work demonstrating that, if their warning effects are controlled, the facilitatory effects of fixation point offsets are response dependent, and suggesting the existence of a component process (fixation release) which is closely linked with the processing architecture underlying target-directed saccades.

Cues↗

PubMed1995

Restricted ability to recover three-dimensional global motion from one-dimensional motion signals: psychophysical observations.

We tested human ability to recover the 3D structure and motion information from time-varying images where only 1D motion cues were available. Under these conditions, observers exhibit poor performance in discriminating between two perpendicular axes of rotation, or discriminating between rigid and non-rigid 3D motion. This behavior of the visual system is to be contrasted with the good depth from motion performance exhibited when 2D motion cues are given in the image, as was found previously in numerous studies, and also in the work presented here. In a related paper, we suggest a theoretical framework in which to understand this differential performance on the basis of the two types of motion cues (1D vs 2D). Our findings are consistent with those of previous studies of frontoparallel motion, where it was shown that in many cases, the 1D cues alone were not integrated by the visual system into the correct global motion percept. This accumulating evidence suggests that oriented (1D) motion detectors alone cannot account for observed human performance of global motion perception, and that the role of units such as point or endpoint detectors should be studied further.

Cues↗