PubMed · 7205313
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
E Arbit, R L Ruff. 1981. A blind spot tester.. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.44.1.92
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Four experiments are reported in which the subjects had to respond to a target that masked a preceding prime via metacontrast masking. In one part of Experiment 1, the subjects discriminated the target's shape (square or diamond) by a motor-choice reaction, and in another part they had to respond with a simple reaction. The prime was neutral (circular) with respect to the target's shape. The data showed a facilitation effect. In both tasks the reaction time was reduced by the masked prime. However, the reduction was more pronounced with simple reaction than with choice reaction. In the other experiments, additional primes were used with the same angular shapes as the targets. In Experiments 2 and 3, after discriminating the target's shape by a choice reaction, the subjects had to judge the prime's shape in a signal-detection task. While neither the d' value for discriminating the angular primes from the circular ones (Exp. 2) nor the d' value for distinguishing between the angular primes (Exp. 3) was different from zero, the choice-reaction data showed a congruency effect. With a congruent prime (i.e., a prime that had the same shape as the target), the reaction times were reduced. With an incongruent prime, the reaction times grew. In Experiment 4 the errors were investigated. The facilitation effect was present in the RT, but not in the number of errors, whereas the congruency effect was present in the number, but not in the RT of errors. While the facilitation effect can be attributed either to an unspecific activation by the masked prime or to an influence of the prime on attentional processes, the congruency effect can be explained by the assumption that the masked prime directly activates the specific response, which corresponds to the prime's shape.
Psychometric functions for motion detection were measured for various spatial velocity profiles made of independently moving lines of random dots. In the first experiment, sensitivity was greater for square-wave velocity profiles than for sine waves of the same fundamental spatial frequency. Sensitivity for square waves depended on the phase of the waveform with respect to the fixation point, which precludes a characterization of the processes underlying the detection of shearing motion as a translation-invariant system. The second experiment, using velocity fields created by spatial super-position of sine waves, showed that motion boundaries facilitate detection of motion due to the steepness of the velocity gradient, and not simply because of added power at higher harmonics. In the third experiment, fluted velocity waveforms were created by subtracting the fundamental sinusoidal component from square waves, retaining sharp motion boundaries between opposing directions but removing the regions of uniform motion. Subtracting the fundamental from low-frequency square waves did not lower sensitivity to motion, indicating that sensitivity was largely determined by the presence of motion boundaries. In the final section of this article, a model is presented that can account for the data by using linear center-surround velocity mechanisms whose sizes increase with eccentricity while their sensitivity for shearing motion decreases.
A photic stimulus flashed just before a saccade in the dark tends to be mislocalized in the direction of the saccade. This mislocalization is not only perceptual; it is also expressed by errors of ocular targeting. A particular situation arises if the point of light is flashed twice at the same place, the second time, just before a saccade. The point of light may appear at two different places even though neither the site of its retinal image nor the direction of gaze change between the flashes. Experiments were run on five human subjects, head fixed in the dark, with flashes repeated at the site of the saccade goal or at the initial point of fixation. In both cases, the test stimulus was mislocalized. However, its apparent displacement never produced the perception of a streak. Streaks were reported only when there was an actual stimulus movement on the retina (e.g. by flashing the stimulus during the saccade). Mislocalization did not occur if the two flashes were not separated by a dark interval. This implies that, as long as a steady stimulus remains continually visible, there is no updating of the internal representation of eye position assumed to be used for stimulus localization.