PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7207429

CT scanner comparison.

F C Southon
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A survey of six production CT scanners in clinical use has been carried out. The scanner types are the ACTA 0200, EMI 1007, EMI 5005, GE 7800, DELTA 2010, and the AS & E 500. Measurements were made of the noise, spatial resolution, edge enhancement, axial position sensitivity, artefact, and dose. Dose is expressed in terms of the total absorbed energy or the volume integral of the dose, as this is considered the factor most directly related to patient risk. A relationship between dose and picture quality parameters is developed and applied to the scanners for a wide range of settings. Particular emphasis has been placed on evaluting the different operating modes of each scanner. The results show a great variation between machines, especially in the relationship between resolution and noise, and the performance achieved for the dose delivered.

Explore related subjects

Energy TransferEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansRadiation DosageTomography, X-Ray ComputedComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F C Southon. CT scanner comparison.. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.594909

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1995

Decomposition of interaction free energies in proteins and other complex systems.

A recent analysis of Mark and van Gunsteren has questioned the validity of separating different free energy components in proteins, or indeed in any complex system. The separability of free energy terms is re-examined from both a theoretical and a numerical perspective. Using a power series expansion of the free energy, it is found that the leading terms are free energy components that arise from individual contributions to the Hamiltonian ("in situ" free energies). The energetic part of an in situ free energy component is given by the ensemble average of the corresponding Hamiltonian component, while the leading term in the entropic part, which was missing in the analysis of Mark and van Gunsteren, is given by the mean square fluctuation. In addition there are correlations between fluctuations in each Hamiltonian component, which give rise to a coupling, or correlation entropy. A simple system, whose configurational degrees of freedom can be completely sampled, was examined in order to determine the relative sizes of these different contributions to the free energy. Under certain conditions, the change in system free energy observed when a particular component of the Hamiltonian is removed or altered is well approximated by the change in the in situ free energy of that component. In practical terms, this allows one in these cases to separate out different free energy contributions.

Energy Transfer↗
PubMed1995

Macromolecular arrangement in the aminoacyl-tRNA.elongation factor Tu.GTP ternary complex. A fluorescence energy transfer study.

The distance between the corner of the L-shaped transfer RNA and the GTP bound to elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) in the aminoacyl-tRNA.EF-Tu.GTP ternary complex was measured using fluorescence energy transfer. The donor dye, fluorescein (Fl), was attached covalently to the 4-thiouridine base at position 8 of tRNAPhe, and aminoacylation yielded Phe-tRNAPhe-Fl8. The ribose of GTP was covalently modified at the 2'(3') position with the acceptor dye rhodamine (Rh) to form GTP-Rh. Formation of the Phe-tRNAPhe-Fl8.EF-Tu.GTP-Rh ternary complex was verified both by EF-Tu protection of the aminoacyl bond from chemical hydrolysis and by an EF-Tu.GTP-dependent increase in fluorescein intensity. Spectral analyses revealed that both the emission intensity and lifetime of fluorescein were greater in the Phe-tRNAPhe-Fl8.EF-Tu.GTP ternary complex than in the Phe-tRNAPhe-Fl8.EF-Tu.GTP-Rh ternary complex. These spectral differences disappeared when excess GTP was added to replace GTP-Rh in the latter ternary complex, thereby showing that excited-state energy was transferred from fluorescein to rhodamine in the ternary complex. The efficiency of singlet-singlet energy transfer was low (10-12%), corresponding to a distance between the donor and acceptor dyes in the ternary complex of 70 +/- 7 A, where the indicated uncertainty reflects the uncertainty in dye orientation. After correction for the lengths of the probe attachment tethers, the 2'(3')-oxygen of the GTP ribose and the sulfur in the s4U are separated by a minimum of 49 A. This large distance limits the possible arrangements of the EF-Tu and the tRNA in the ternary complex.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Energy Transfer↗
PubMed1995

Theory of fluorescence induction in photosystem II: derivation of analytical expressions in a model including exciton-radical-pair equilibrium and restricted energy transfer between photosynthetic units.

The theoretical relationships between the fluorescence and photochemical yields of PS II and the fraction of open reaction centers are examined in a general model endowed with the following features: i) a homogeneous, infinite PS II domain; ii) exciton-radical-pair equilibrium; and iii) different rates of exciton transfer between core and peripheral antenna beds. Simple analytical relations are derived for the yields and their time courses in induction experiments. The introduction of the exciton-radical-pair equilibrium, for both the open and closed states of the trap, is shown to be equivalent to an irreversible trapping scheme with modified parameters. Variation of the interunit transfer rate allows continuous modulation from the case of separated units to the pure lake model. Broadly used relations for estimating the relative amount of reaction centers from the complementary area of the fluorescence kinetics or the photochemical yield from fluorescence levels are examined in this framework. Their dependence on parameters controlling exciton decay is discussed, allowing assessment of their range of applicability. An experimental induction curve is analyzed, with a discussion of its decomposition into alpha and beta contributions. The sigmoidicity of the induction kinetics is characterized by a single parameter J related to Joliot's p, which is shown to depend on both the connectivity of the photosynthetic units and reaction center parameters. On the other hand, the relation between J and the extreme fluorescence levels (or the deviation from the linear Stern-Volmer dependence of 1/phi f on the fraction of open traps) is controlled only by antenna connectivity. Experimental data are consistent with a model of connected units for PS II alpha, intermediate between the pure lake model of unrestricted exciton transfer and the isolated units model.

Energy Transfer↗