PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7211860

Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.

Abstract

The application of statistical tests to the evaluation of hypotheses is discussed. The statistical test is used to determine whether or not a hypothesis is correct by telling the researcher how likely it is that the results of an experiment are due to chance alone. Generally, a null hypothesis is set up stating that there is no difference between the control and experimental samples. The data are than collected and analyzed, and the null hypothesis is either accepted or rejected. The researcher, before beginning actual experimentation, should establish a level of significance to indicate how certain he wishes to be that the results are not due to chance alone. Traditionally, this level is set at 95% or 99% (expressed as a level of significance of 0.05 or 0.01, respectively). In using these tests, two types of error are possible. The null hypothesis can be rejected when it is in fact true (Type I error), or it can be accepted when it is false (Type II error). Since all statistical tests are based on certain assumptions concerning the data, the test applied to experimental results must be chosen to fit the data (e.g., collection methods, distribution type). for these reasons, statistical tests should be chosen before the experiment, and the experimental procedures should be tailored to fit the statistical test so that the validity of the analysis will be maximized.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M H Stolar. 1980. Interpretation of research data: hypothesis testing.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7211860/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗