PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7221636

On making clinical research count.

Abstract

Principles of sound research design are inconstantly applied to scientific investigations. Quality research depends on good study design. Many research groups appear to favor quick publishable experiments over more rigorously controlled ones. Clinicians seem inadequately prepared to critically evaluate journal articles for quality of research, clinical relevance, and comparability of reports. Clinicians and researchers alike are increasingly aware of these problems, and are calling for greater attention to research design in scientific work. Authors should explain their procedures and the study's relevance to clinical practice. Educators are encouraged to increase teaching of research design and interpretation of scientific writing.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Lippmann, W Regan. 1981. On making clinical research count.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-198103000-00025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

An overview of the integrative research review.

The integrative literature review has many benefits to the scholarly reviewer, including evaluating the strength of the scientific evidence, identifying gaps in current research, identifying the need for future research, bridging between related areas of work, identifying central issues in an area, generating a research question, identifying a theoretical or conceptual framework, and exploring which research methods have been used successfully. The 5-stage integrative review process includes (1) problem formulation, (2) data collection or literature search, (3) evaluation of data, (4) data analysis, and (5) interpretation and presentation of results. Maintaining scientific integrity while conducting an integrative research review involves careful consideration to threats to validity. Strategies to overcome these threats are reviewed. The integrative review methodology must involve detailed and thoughtful work, the outcome of which can be a significant contribution to a particular body of knowledge and, consequently, to practice and research.

Research Design↗