PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7233716

[Endoscopic diagnostic errors in colon cancer].

V D Fedorov·V P Strekalovskiĭ·G I Ezhova·M Milanov
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The results of colonoscopy in 567 patients with malignant tumors of the colon have shown that in 10,0% of cases there were errors in primary endoscopic diagnosis due to inferior examination of the colon, missing of malignant tumors, misinterpretation of the alterations revealed. The authors believe that a single endoscopic examination can not be considered decisive, especially when tumor had been clinically or roentgenologically suspected. Only repeated dynamic observations during 12-14 months with 1-3 month intervals can give final conclusions. The authors believe the thorough early analysis, knowledge of endoscopic symptoms, correct estimation of the data of colonoscopy and biopsy to allow avoiding serious diagnostic errors in future.

Explore related subjects

BiopsyColonic NeoplasmsColonoscopyDiagnostic ErrorsHumansSigmoidoscopyEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V D Fedorov, V P Strekalovskiĭ, G I Ezhova, M Milanov. 1981. [Endoscopic diagnostic errors in colon cancer].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7233716/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗