PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7249929

Evaluating clinical programs: methodological guidelines.

Abstract

Evaluations can be defined as investigations of the merits of clinical programs, and they provide information about program goals/objectives, processes, outcomes, impact, and costs. How can reliable and credible evaluations be conducted? In this article, criteria are given for posing evaluation questions; selecting samples and research designs; collecting, analyzing, interpreting, and reporting data.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Fink, J Kosecoff. Evaluating clinical programs: methodological guidelines.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7249929/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Pharmacist-operated drug information centers in the United States.

Pharmacist-operated drug information centers (DICs) in the United States were surveyed to obtain current information on the availability and scope of their services. Questionnaires were mailed in late 1991 to 179 institutions believed to have organized DICs. Topics covered in the questionnaire included staffing, resources, funding, and services provided. The results were compared with previous survey results to identify trends. Through 1992, 120 usable responses were received. Compared with findings from earlier surveys, DICs' affiliations with medical centers and hospitals have declined and affiliations with pharmacy schools have increased. More personnel work in DICs than ever. Computers are now used by nearly every DIC, there is an increased emphasis on quality-assurance programs for services rendered, and many DICs have increased revenue with new and expanded services. Although DICs are no longer increasing in number, their services are becoming more sophisticated.

Drug Information Services