The constructional approach to behavioral modification.

Abstract

The constructional approach to behavioral modification, first formally recognized by Goldiamond (1974), is discussed against the background of the approach to which it is an alternative, the eliminative model. While the latter directs practitioners to focus on eliminating problem behavior, the constructional approach attempts to solve problems by building behavioral repertoires. It is pointed out that the constructional approach is not necessarily incompatible with the eliminative approach. Implications of the eliminative-constructional distinction are discussed for the major aspects of behavioral interventions--behavioral analysis, determination of goals, and change procedures. Some research implications of the distinction are considered. Such issues as clients' right to treatment and to refuse punitive procedures make further development of the constructional approach imperative.