PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7260539

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Abstract

Small mobile stones in the major renal collecting system can be extracted through a percutaneous tract. Initially the radiologist performs a conventional percutaneous needle nephrostomy and inserts a pigtail catheter into the renal pelvis. Over the next week the tract formed is serially dilated to a size large enough to pass a cystoscope into the kidney. The calculi are trapped by a stone basket and removed. The many advantages of this relatively atraumatic procedure are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J E Wickham, M J Kellett. 1981. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1981.tb03181.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Complications associated with enteral nutrition using catheter jejunostomy after esophagectomy.

The present study was conducted on 78 patients, encountered over a 7-year period, who had a catheter-feeding jejunostomy placed at the time of thoracoabdominal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. A broad-based attachment of the jejunal wall to the peritoneum at the place of entry of the catheter was used. Enteral nutrition was begun an average of 10 days after the operation, the caloric content was increased gradually, and the mean duration was 69 days. There were three patients who suffered from local skin erosion at the site of catheter entry, and seven who developed diarrhea and/or a feeling of abdominal fullness, but none of the patients showed any signs of peritonitis or ileus. The morbidity rates related to enteral nutrients and placement of the catheter jejunostomy were 8.9% and 3.8%, respectively. These findings demonstrate that a broad-based attachment of the jejunal wall to the peritoneum at the place of entry of the catheter is useful for preventing leakage or twisting of the jejunum, and for reducing the incidence and severity of the complications of catheter jejunostomy feeding.

Catheterization

A prospective, randomized comparison of Foley catheter insertion versus intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel for preinduction cervical ripening.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel with insertion of a Foley bulb for efficacy in preinduction cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: Women who came to the hospital for induction of labor with a Bishop score </=5 were randomly assigned to treatment with either prostaglandin E2 gel or a Foley bulb. Prostaglandin E2 gel was used according to the manufacturer's recommendation. The Foley group had a number 14 Foley catheter inserted, inflated, and placed on traction. Immediately after Foley bulb extrusion or 6 hours after prostaglandin E2 gel course completion, a dilute oxytocin solution was started if the patient was not in labor. RESULTS: Seventy-seven women were entered into the Foley group and 72 were entered into the prostaglandin E2 gel group. Both the Bishop score after preinduction ripening (6.5 vs 5.1, P <.001) and the change in Bishop score (3.5 vs 2.7, P =.015) were significantly higher in the Foley group. There were no differences between the groups in mode of delivery, infant weight, rate of hyperstimulation, shoulder dystocia, patient discomfort, epidural use, oxytocin use, or nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. The preinduction time (9.9 vs 17.2 hours, P <.001) and the total induction time (22.4 vs 30.4 hours, P <.001) were significantly shorter in the Foley group. Patient charges were 31% lower in the Foley group (P <.001). CONCLUSION: Use of the Foley catheter resulted in a higher postinduction Bishop score, a greater change in Bishop score, a shorter induction time, and lower patient charges than did intracervical prostaglandin E2 gel.

Catheterization