PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7270722

Biorhythms: fact or superstition?

D K Winstead·B D Schwartz·W E Bertrand
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Although much has appeared in the lay literature regarding the role of biorhythms in life events, few empirical data exist to support the notion that biorhythms affect our lives. The authors first examined the relationship between biorhythms and date of psychiatric hospitalization for 218 patients. They then compared the dates of psychiatric emergency room visits for 386 patients with each patient's biorhythms. The results from both studies failed to reveal a significant relationship between time of psychiatric admission or psychiatric emergency room visit and various phases of the biorhythm cycle. The biorhythm theory is much too simplistic to account for the complexities of everyday life. Therefore, belief in the theory is likely to be an expression of superstitious behavior.

Explore related subjects

HospitalizationHumansMental DisordersPeriodicityJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D K Winstead, B D Schwartz, W E Bertrand. 1981. Biorhythms: fact or superstition?. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.138.9.1188

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

End-stage renal disease measures of quality.

During the past 35 years, there has been a geometric expansion of the population of patients receiving chronic dialysis therapy in the United States. As the size and associated costs of the dialysis population have grown, there has been a consistent and evolving emphasis on measuring and improving the quality of dialysis care. These efforts, aided by robust data collection vehicles, have translated into defined clinical performance measures; nevertheless, morbidity and mortality rates remain high for the dialysis population. Recently, attention has focused on whether improved outcomes could be obtained by paying physicians and dialysis providers on the basis of quality metrics. The feasibility, value, pitfalls, and appropriate quality metrics in a "payment-for-quality" program for dialysis care are currently under vigorous discussion.

Hospitalization↗
PubMed2006

Changes in practice patterns affecting in-hospital and post-discharge survival among ACS patients.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of specific illnesses may result in unexpected outcomes, given that multiple therapies must often be given to patients with diverse medical conditions. Yet, few studies have presented empirical evidence that quality improvement (QI) programs both change practice by improving adherence to guidelines and improve patient outcomes under the conditions of actual practice. Thus, we focus on patient survival, following hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome in three successive patient cohorts from the same community hospitals, with a quality improvement intervention occurring between cohorts two and three. METHODS: This study is a comparison of three historical cohorts of Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) patients in the same five community hospitals in 1994-5, 1997, 2002-3. A quality improvement project, the Guidelines Applied to Practice (GAP), was implemented in these hospitals in 2001. Study participants were recruited from community hospitals located in two Michigan communities during three separate time periods. The cohorts comprise (1) patients enrolled between December 1993 and April 1995 (N = 814), (2) patients enrolled between February 1997 and September 1997 (N = 452), and (3) patients enrolled between January 14, 2002 and April 13, 2003 (N = 710). Mortality data were obtained from Michigan's Bureau of Vital Statistics for all three patient cohorts. Predictor variables, obtained from medical record reviews, included demographic information, indicators of disease severity (ejection fraction), co-morbid conditions, hospital treatment information concerning most invasive procedures and the use of ace-inhibitors, beta-blockers and aspirin in the hospital and as discharge recommendations. RESULTS: Adjusted in-hospital mortality showed a marked improvement with a HR = 0.16 (p < 0.001) comparing 2003 patients in the same hospitals to those 10 years earlier. Large gains in the in-hospital mortality were maintained based on 1-year mortality rates after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Changes in practice patterns that follow recommended guidelines can significantly improve care for ACS patients. In-hospital mortality gains were maintained in the year following discharge.

Hospitalization↗