PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7285624

Methotrexate for psoriasis: 1981.

Abstract

Although not stated in body of this article, it is best to start treatment with a very small test dose. Furthermore, one should use methotrexate only when other methods fail or are impractical. In general, the criterion of life-ruining disease should be considered the primary indication. Drugs interactions should be avoided. Probenecid, phenylbutazone, and colchicine are contraindicated. Increased toxicity may occur with concomitant use of salicylates, sulfonamides, barbiturates, para-aminobenzoic acid, diphenylhydantoin, oral contraceptives, and weak organic acids. It would appear at this time that any dose being administered more often than once weekly is too toxic for the liver. Perhaps the intramuscular route is safest. Finally, the official guidelines should be followed as closely as possible, even possibly including liver biopsies. It should be recognized that liver biopsy is not without hazard, as deaths have been reported from simple needle liver biopsies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R B Rees. 1981. Methotrexate for psoriasis: 1981.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7285624/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Using engineering control principles to inform the design of adaptive interventions: a conceptual introduction.

The goal of this paper is to describe the role that control engineering principles can play in developing and improving the efficacy of adaptive, time-varying interventions. It is demonstrated that adaptive interventions constitute a form of feedback control system in the context of behavioral health. Consequently, drawing from ideas in control engineering has the potential to significantly inform the analysis, design, and implementation of adaptive interventions, leading to improved adherence, better management of limited resources, a reduction of negative effects, and overall more effective interventions. This article illustrates how to express an adaptive intervention in control engineering terms, and how to use this framework in a computer simulation to investigate the anticipated impact of intervention design choices on efficacy. The potential benefits of operationalizing decision rules based on control engineering principles are particularly significant for adaptive interventions that involve multiple components or address co-morbidities, situations that pose significant challenges to conventional clinical practice.

Drug Administration Schedule↗