PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7292238

The Income Survey Development Program: design features and initial findings.

Abstract

This article summarizes the principal design features of the Income Survey Development Program (ISDP) and presents initial findings of its 1979 Research Panel. The ISDP was designed to meet the need for improved data--particularly information on cash and in-kind income, assets and debts, tax liabilities, and participation in the major income security programs. The ISDP examined many technical and operational problems that were difficult to satisfy with existing surveys and administrative record systems. The ISDP field tests indicated that several experimental features were successful. These include use of more frequent interviews, a sample that is followed over a period of more than a year, a flexible questionnaire structure that permits insertion of questions on emerging policy issues, and procedures to maximize the linking of survey data with information in administrative records. Initial findings from the 1979 Research Panel indicate the number of persons receiving benefits from more than one major transfer program and compare the assets of food stamp recipients with those of eligible nonparticipants and ineligible persons.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Ycas, C A Lininger. 1981. The Income Survey Development Program: design features and initial findings.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7292238/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Food-service establishment wastewater characterization.

Food-service establishments that use on-site wastewater treatment systems are experiencing pretreatment system and/or drain field hydraulic and/or organic overloading. This study included characterization of four wastewater parameters (five-day biochemical oxygen demand [BOD5]; total suspended solids [TSS]; food, oil, and grease [FOG]; and flow) from 28 restaurants located in Texas during June, July, and August 2002. The field sampling methodology included taking a grab sample from each restaurant for 6 consecutive days at approximately the same time each day, followed by a 2-week break, and then sampling again for another 6 consecutive days, for a total of 12 samples per restaurant and 336 total observations. The analysis indicates higher organic (BOD5) and hydraulic values for restaurants than those typically found in the literature. The design values for this study for BOD5, TSS, FOG, and flow were 1523, 664, and 197 mg/L, and 96 L/day-seat respectively, which captured over 80% of the data collected.

Food Services↗