PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7294537

Learning from quantitation.

Abstract

An important question in the effective use of quantitation in cytology is how to make the link between mathematical parameters and the cytologist. As an example, an investigation is discussed in which cell images from benign mesothelial proliferations were distinguished by quantitative characteristics from those of malignant mesotheliomas originating in the pleura and peritoneum. The significant differences between the three groups in nuclear size, cytoplasmic size and nuclear-cytoplasmic (N/C) ratio could partly be explained by the vacuolation patterns of the exfoliated mesothelial cells in each. Moreover, the primary site of the tumor could be predicted by the quantitative cell parameters. The characteristics of cytologic images, once known to be important, are easily incorporated into standard diagnosis. Thus it now seems possible for the cytologist to differentiate between the three groups by using the cytomorphologic features that relate to the computed parameters. This shows the value of translating computerized parameters into cytomorphologic criteria.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C L Alons, R W Veldhuizen, M E Boon. 1981. Learning from quantitation.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7294537/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Cytokine production profiles in the peritoneal fluids of patients with malignant or benign gynecologic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Cytokines play a key role in the regulation of cells of the immune system and also have been implicated in the pathogenesis of malignant diseases. Some cytokines have been shown to have potential in the diagnosis of cancer. METHODS: A total of 111 patients with ovarian, cervical, or endometrial carcinomas or benign ovarian or uterine tumors were enrolled on the study, and the levels of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, interferon (IFN)-gamma, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha were measured by cytokine specific, enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assays. In addition, ratios of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-gamma production were studied to characterize the type of T-cell response that occurred in the peritoneal cavities of the patients. RESULTS: High levels of M-CSF (mean for all patients, 26,050 pg/mL) and G-CSF (mean for all patients, 20,267 pg/mL) were observed in virtually all patients, but no significant differences between the study groups were observed. Similarly, no differences in the levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-10, IFN-gamma, GM-CSF, or TNF-alpha were found. However, IL-6 levels were significantly higher in patients with ovarian carcinoma (mean +/- standard error of the mean [SEM]: 5572 +/- 1266) or benign tumors (mean +/- SEM: 4474 +/- 2008) than in those with cervical (mean +/- SEM: 1222 +/- 546) or endometrial carcinoma (mean +/- SEM: 1977 +/- 616). A predominantly Th1 type cytokine profile, irrespective of the diagnosis, was observed in patients with gynecologic tumors. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of IL-6, the cytokine synthesis profiles in the peritoneal fluids of patients with benign and malignant gynecologic tumors were found to be similar. These results suggest that cytokine production in these patients is a result of nonspecific inflammation rather than a specific response against the tumor cells, and that skewing of cytokine synthesis toward either the Th1 or the Th2 phenotype is not the underlying mechanism resulting in the malignant process in women with gynecologic tumors.

Ascitic Fluid

Development of a quantitative chemical ionization gas chromatography-mass spectrometry method to detect tuberculostearic acid in body fluids.

We developed a mass spectral method to verify the detection of free tuberculostearic acid (TSA) by frequency-pulsed electron-capture gas chromatography (FPEC-GC) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), serum, pericardial fluid, ascites fluid and pleural fluid of patients infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. To obtain satisfactory sensitivity and specificity for comparison of the test using mass spectrometry (MS) in the single ion monitor (SIM) mode to the FPEC-GC test, we developed a specific, sensitive, quantitative chemical ionization mass spectrometry capillary gas chromatography (QCIGC-MS) test. The procedure maximized the molecular ion (i.e., made it the base peak) for increased specificity and sensitivity, and instrument parameters for increased sensitivity. The procedure uses a computerized approach, requiring an internal standard (nonadecanoic acid) for precise measurement of the retention time and quantitation of the molecular ion of TSA. Data from this study suggest that QCIGC-MS analysis could be a valuable tool to confirm FPEC-GC identification of TSA in CSF, serum, and in pleural, ascites, and pericardial fluids.

Ascitic Fluid

Detection of ovarian cancer cells: comparison of a telomerase assay and cytologic examination.

BACKGROUND: Telomerase is an enzyme essential for the normal replication of chromosomes. Telomerase activity is absent in most somatic cells in adults, but it is usually expressed in cancer cells, including ovarian carcinoma cells. Our principal goal was to compare the sensitivity of a telomerase assay, i.e., the telomeric repeat amplification protocol (TRAP) assay, with that of cytologic examination in detecting cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: TRAP assays and cytologic examinations were performed on peritoneal washings and ascitic fluids from 42 patients with active ovarian carcinoma. Control specimens included washings from 29 patients with benign ovarian diseases and ascitic fluids from 14 patients with liver failure. We also evaluated the stability of telomerase in ascitic fluids left unprocessed at room temperature as well as the ability of the TRAP assay to detect cancer cells in mixtures containing large numbers of normal cells. RESULTS: Specimens from 37 (88%) of the 42 patients with ovarian carcinoma tested positive for telomerase. Cytologic examination detected cancer cells in only 27 of the telomerase-positive specimens (i.e., in specimens from 64% of the 42 patients). This difference of 24% (95% confidence interval = 17%-30%) in sensitivity between the two tests was statistically significant (two-sided P = .002). Specimens from five of the patients with ovarian carcinoma were cytologically negative and telomerase negative. All 43 control specimens were cytologically negative, but the TRAP assay detected telomerase in two of them. Telomerase activity was detected in unprocessed samples left at room temperature for 5 days and in mixtures containing a small number of cancer cells and a 2000- to 10000-fold excess of normal cells. CONCLUSIONS: Assaying for telomerase is more sensitive than cytologic examination in detecting cancer cells in the peritoneal cavity of patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Ascitic Fluid