PubMed · 7350881
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
A E Baue. 1980. Why recertification?. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380010005001
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The application process leading to certification by the Education Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) was studied using the group of 9,491 graduates of foreign medical schools who initiated their applications in 1988. Using the ECFMG's database, these applicants' countries of citizenship, examination histories, certification status, and exchange visitor status were determined for a period of seven years and 9 months, ending in September 1995. Within that time, 45% of these applicants became ECFMG-certified, and 26% of that group entered residency programs accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Of the total number of non-U.S. citizens (2,243) who entered such programs, 61% did so as exchange visitor physicians. The remainder had other kinds of visa status, such as permanent resident, or had become U.S. citizens. Although U.S. citizens and non-U.S. citizens achieved certification at the same rate (45%), the U.S. citizens had greater success in obtaining positions in graduate medical education (GME). Seventy-four percent of the ECFMG-certified certified U.S. citizens entered GME, versus 57% of the ECFMG-certified non-U.S. citizens. The status of the 55% of the 9,491 applicants who did not obtain certification is discussed; a portion of this group of this group continues to pursue certification. Details and requirements of the ECFMG certification process are also described.