PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7351834

Flow microfluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis supplementing routine histopathologic diagnosis of biopsy specimens.

Abstract

Flow microfluorometric DNA analysis was applied on a routine basis additionally to the conventional pathologic diagnostics of biopsy samples. The evaluation of the DNA distributions for the determination of the fractions of cells in different stages of the cell cycle was complicated by varying portions of background debris, which was generally found to be present in suspensions of single dispersed cells prepared from solid tissues. By means of computerized subtraction of exponentially decreasing corrections, it was possible to clear the original flow microfluorometric distributions. The contribution of background debris was found to cause erroneous overestimation, particularly in the evaluation of low S-phase fractions. By means of the corrections, even samples containing more than 65 per cent nuclear fragments could be evaluated with sufficient accuracy. The correct evaluation of the S-phase fraction possibly could indicate the degree of differentiation and proliferative activity of tissues. Low S-phase fractions within the range of normal regeneration were found in benign alterations and well differentiated carcinomas. In contrast, S-phase fractions up to 40 per cent were present in poorly differentiated tumors with extended cellular atypia, largely varying nuclear size and staining properties. The combination of conventional pathologic diagnostics with quantitative determination of the fractions of cells within the stages of the cell cycle in biopsy samples on a routine basis could supplement the diagnoses by therapeutically relevant information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Haag. 1980. Flow microfluorometric deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis supplementing routine histopathologic diagnosis of biopsy specimens.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7351834/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗