PubMed · 7363765
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
S Effert. 1980-03-07. [Cardioversion].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7363765/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVES: Atrial flutter is a frequent, potentially fatal complication of the Fontan operation, but risk factors for its development are ill defined. We evaluated clinical features that might predict the development of atrial flutter in patients who had a Fontan operation. METHODS: We evaluated 334 early survivors of a Fontan operation done between April 1973 and July 1991 (mean follow-up, 5.0 +/- 3.8 years). Evaluation included electrocardiography, Holter monitor recordings, and chart review. Modifications of the Fontan operation included an extracardiac conduit (n = 43), an atriopulmonary anastomosis (n = 117), or a total cavopulmonary anastomosis (n = 174). Patient, time, and procedure-related variables were analyzed with respect to the development of atrial flutter. RESULTS: Atrial flutter was identified in 54 (16%) patients at a mean of 5.3 +/- 4.7 years (range 0 to 19.7 years) after Fontan operation. Atrial flutter developed sooner and was more likely to occur in patients who were older at the time of Fontan operation (12.4 +/- 7.6 vs 6.3 +/- 5.2 years; p < 0.001), had a longer follow-up interval (8.7 +/- 3.9 vs 4.4 +/- 3.4 years; p < 0.001), had a prior atrial septectomy or pulmonary artery reconstruction (p < 0.01), and had worse New York Heart Association class symptoms (p < 0.02). The presence of sinus node dysfunction was associated with a higher incidence of atrial flutter (p < 0.001). Although there was a lower prevalence of atrial flutter in those patients with a total cavopulmonary anastomosis, the follow-up for this group was shorter. Anatomic diagnoses, perioperative hemodynamics, and other previous palliative operations were not associated with an increased incidence of atrial flutter. Multivariate analysis identified age at operation, duration of follow-up, extensive atrial baffling, and type of repair as factors associated with the development of atrial flutter after Fontan operation. CONCLUSION: Atrial flutter continues to develop with time after the Fontan operation. Further follow-up is necessary to determine whether a total cavopulmonary anastomosis reduces the incidence of atrial flutter.
OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to elucidate the location and mechanism of typical atrial flutter in the transplanted heart. BACKGROUND: Although the F wave morphology in atrial flutter is similar in nontransplanted and transplanted hearts, the surgical incision needed for the atrial anastomosis may create a distinct electrophysiologic substrate of atrial flutter. METHODS: Entrainment from the lateral wall of the right atrium and interatrial septum was used to determine the location of atrial flutter in five patients with a transplanted heart and six patients with a nontransplanted heart. The difference between the first postpacing interval (FPPI) and the flutter cycle length (FCL) was used as an index of proximity to the circuit. RESULTS: In the transplant group, the FPPI was equal to the FCL at sites located close to the tricuspid annulus (TA); the mean differences (+/-SD) were 1 +/- 5 and -1 +/- 2 ms at the lateral wall and interatrial septum, respectively. However, from sites close to the surgical incision at the lateral wall and at the interatrial septum, these differences were significantly longer (29 +/- 12 and 27 +/- 9 ms, respectively, p < 0.05). In the nontransplant group, the FPPI was similar to the FCL at points in the lateral wall and interatrial septum close to the TA (mean difference 7 +/- 6 and 6 +/- 11 ms, respectively) and at sites close to the crista terminalis (CT) in the lateral wall (mean difference 4 +/- 4 ms). However, in sites separated from the TA at the interatrial septum the difference was markedly longer (35 +/- 11 ms, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial flutter in transplanted hearts may best be explained by macroreentry around the tricuspid ring. In non-transplanted hearts a different structure (perhaps the CT?) may be the basis for atrial flutter at the lateral wall.