PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7372279

Deinstitutionalization: who is left behind?

R A Dorwart
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A study of the demographic and clinical characteristics of 137 patients in a state hospital in Massachusetts on a single day in March 1977, well after the state's massive deinstitutionalization program was in effect, showed that the patients who remained in the hospital needed a high level of care, lacked social relationships, were acutely psychotic, or were dangerous to themselves or to others. The author compares this patient population with patients in all other state mental hospitals in Massachusetts and those in the United States. He believes that an answer to the question "Who is left behind?" is essential for state hospital staff members who must treat these patients and is also important for those planning community programs.

Explore related subjects

DeinstitutionalizationDemographyEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansMental DisordersJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Dorwart. 1980. Deinstitutionalization: who is left behind?. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.31.5.336

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2006

Service use and costs of supporting the most socially disabled patients in a hospital reprovision programme. A two-hospital comparison.

BACKGROUND: The UK, in common with other Western countries, has seen a marked reduction in the number of long-stay hospital beds over the past few decades and most asylums have been closed. Whilst hospital closure and discharge programmes differ, a common characteristic is likely to be that those patients who are "difficult-to-place" in the community are amongst the last to be discharged. This paper compares service use and costs of difficult-to-place patients from two UK hospitals (Friern and Warley) and identifies predictors of cost. One of these hospitals (Warley) provided a more intensive programme of rehabilitation. METHOD: The study included 84 patients (Friern 63, Warley 21). Patient characteristics prior to discharge were recorded. Service use was measured and costs calculated for the year following discharge. Comparisons were made between the Warley and Friern groups and cost predictors were identified using multiple regression analysis. RESULTS: Post-discharge accommodation, in-patient and outpatient costs were substantially higher for the Friern group, whilst the Warley group had higher day care costs. The total mean costs were pound 13,432 higher for the Friern group. However, non-accommodation costs were substantially higher for the Warley group. Patients with more social skills had higher non-accommodation costs. Higher total costs were associated with more self-care skills, fewer domestic skills and younger age. Longer length of stay prior to discharge was associated with higher non-accommodation and total costs. CONCLUSIONS: The costs of care following discharge differed substantially between these two groups. This is partly a supply effect given the different strategies for caring for these difficult-to-place patients. In common with other studies, patient characteristics can explain some of the differences in future costs.

Deinstitutionalization↗
PubMed2006

Community reentry: perceptions of people with substance use problems returning home from New York City jails.

Each year about 100,000 people return to New York City communities from municipal jails. Although about four-fifths report drug or alcohol problems, few have received any formal drug treatment while in jail. Researchers and practitioners have identified a number of policies related to corrections, income, housing, and drug treatment that may be harmful to the successful reintegration of people leaving jail. In order to explore the challenges to successful community reentry, six focus groups and one in-depth interview were conducted with 37 men and women who had been released from jail or prison in the last 12 months. Participants were asked to describe their experiences prior to and immediately following release from jail. Findings suggest that many people leaving jail are not prepared for release and, upon release, face a myriad of obstacles to becoming healthy, productive members of their communities. We discuss the implications of these findings for programs and policies that promote community reintegration of individuals returning from correctional facilities.

Deinstitutionalization↗