PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7373243

Constructing cognitive maps from sentences.

Abstract

Three experiments investigated the construction of one- and two-dimensional cognitive maps from presented sentences containing information about adjacent pairs of items in the map. Sentences were of the form The item is X of the item or The item has the item on its X side when items were high-frequency nouns and X was the adjective north, south, east, or west. Hypotheses derived from three-term series and linear ordering work were tested. Increasing the number of dimensions and end anchors did not affect performance, although increasing the number of items lowered performance. Construction was best when the ordering was complete rather than partial, when each incoming sentence presented new information that could be immediately integrated with previously presented information, when new items could be added to the end rather than the beginning of a stored representation, and when the sentence adjective was congruent with the placement of the new item in the map. This last result appears to depend to some extent on the representational strategy adopted by participants.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P W Foos. 1980. Constructing cognitive maps from sentences.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7373243/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Forearm postural control during unloading: anticipatory changes in elbow stiffness.

In this study, the equilibrium-point hypothesis of muscle-torque generation is used to evaluate the changes in central control parameters in the process of postural-maintenance learning. Muscle torque is described by a linear spring equation with modifiable stiffness, viscosity, and equilibrium angle. The stiffness is considered to be the estimation of the central command for antagonist-muscle coactivation and the equilibrium angle to be the estimation of the reciprocal command for a shift of invariant characteristics of the joint. In the experiments, a load applied to the forearm was released. The subjects were instructed to maintain their forearm in the initial horizontal position. Five sessions of approximately twenty trials each were carried out by eight subjects. During two "control" series, the load release was triggered by the experimenter. During three "learning" series, the load supported by one forearm was released by the subject's other hand. The elbow-joint angle, the angular acceleration, and the external load on the postural forearm were recorded. These recordings as well as anthropometric forearm characteristics were used to calculate the elbow-joint torque (which we called "experimental"). Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the equilibrium angle, joint stiffness, and viscosity at each trial. The "theoretical" torque was calculated using a linear spring equation with the found parameters. The good agreement observed between experimental and theoretical joint-torque time courses, apart from the very early period following unloading, argues in favor of the idea that the movement was mainly performed under a constant central command presetting the joint stiffness and the equilibrium angle. An overall increase in the stiffness occurred simultaneously with a decrease in the equilibrium angle during the "learning" series in all the subjects. This suggests that subjects learn to compensate for the disturbing effects of unloading by increasing the joint stiffness. The mechanism possibly responsible for the presetting of the central control parameters is discussed.

Cognition

Cognitive performance after cardiac operation: implications of regression toward the mean.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of regression toward the mean on different definitions of cognitive dysfunction after coronary artery bypass graft operation. METHODS: A total of 120 patients who underwent nonemergency coronary bypass operation and who were involved in a randomized trial of an anti-inflammatory agent were assessed prospectively with a battery of 10 psychometric tests covering a variety of cognitive domains. The battery was administered before the operation and 5 days and 3 months after the operation. Data from 2 representative tests, the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and the Trail Making Test (part A), were used. The influence of regression toward the mean on 3 commonly used single-case definitions of cognitive impairment (1 SD method; one-half SD method; 20% method) was analyzed. RESULTS: Group mean performance deteriorated on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test at the discharge assessment (P <.001) and remained below baseline at 3 months (P =.03). Mean performance on the Trail Making Test (part A) showed a near-significant decline at discharge (P =. 06), followed by improvement at 3 months (P <.01). Regression toward the mean was demonstrated on both tests by classifying the preoperative scores into low, moderate, and high-performance categories. Applying the different definitions of dysfunction resulted in substantially larger numbers of patients in the high-performance group being classified as impaired. CONCLUSION: Single-case definitions of cognitive dysfunction are influenced strongly by regression toward the mean. Disproportionate numbers of high-baseline performers are classified as impaired, thereby questioning the validity of established definitions. Group mean analysis with controls is potentially the most reliable method for detecting real change or differences.

Cognition