PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7382056

How readable are subject consent forms?

Abstract

A consent to treatment form provides required information that a patient may use to give intelligent, informed consent to proposed treatment. This study applied two standard techniques to assess the degree to which 60 informed consent forms from five national cancer clinical trial groups were readable and understandable by patients. The forms were found slightly less difficult to comprehend than medical journals but substantially more difficult than comparable materials from the popular press. Three of four passages describing treatment methods, procedures, discomforts, and risks required a college level or greater reading ability to comprehend. Informed consent documents may not be understood by a substantial portion of patients who sign them. The very regulations designed to ensure a patient's informed cooperation with treatment may inadvertently lead to forms that are so complex as to make informed cooperation virtually impossible.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G R Morrow. 1980-07-04. How readable are subject consent forms?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7382056/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Quality of pharmacists' documentations in patients' medical records.

Training pharmacists to appropriately document patient-specific problems and recommendations in patients' medical records and subsequent monitoring of pharmacist-written documentation are described. The medical staff of a tertiary care teaching hospital recommended that pharmacists be allowed to write in the permanent portion of patients' medical records. A six-month pilot program was approved to train pharmacists in writing chart notes. Notes would be assessed according to the following criteria: necessity (i.e., a chart note was the appropriate means of communication), clarity, legibility, completeness, correct format, and lack of judgmental language. Initial training was by physicians from the pharmacy and therapeutics committee, with more extensive training by a committee composed of clinical and administrative pharmacists. After training ended, each pharmacist's first few notes were reviewed by a member of the pharmacy committee. The quality of pharmacist-written notes is reviewed quarterly. The first quarterly evaluation and another review 1 1/2 years later showed that all pharmacist notes met all of the established criteria. A multidisciplinary approach was effective in training pharmacists to document interventions appropriately in patients' permanent records. Ongoing monitoring ensures the continuing quality of such documentation.

Documentation