PubMed1996
This paper describes the first of two complementary studies designed to identify and to investigate the properties and likely functional significance of independently generated components of scalp-recorded responses evoked by stationary patterns. These experiments compared the influence of various stimulus parameters, including site of stimulation, pattern form, nature of background field and several binocular and monocular depth cues on a single subject's visual evoked potentials. The results revealed the presence, inter alia, of two topographically distinct components with the following properties. The earlier component (C2), whose polarity depends on the stimulus location in the visual field, is: contour-specific; best evoked by discrete pattern elements, but not gratings, in the central few degrees of the visual field; insensitive to any depth cues. By contrast, the later (consistently) negative potential (LNP) is not dependent on the form of the stimulus and is larger for paracentrally (beyond 1.5 degrees) than centrally located stimuli. It is also selectively enhanced by both monocular and binocular depth-cue stimuli, including the simulated forward movement of a pattern relative to a steady textured background; a stimulus which evokes no C2. The respective response properties of these scalp potentials suggest that there is parallel processing of depth- and contour-related features of stationary stimuli in anatomically separate regions of the human visual cortex.