PubMed · 7383062
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
K L Cohen. 1980-07-10. "Sinutabs" for cluster headache.. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198007103030212
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
In studies designed to simulate a clinical observation in which an individual became tolerant to normally lethal doses of acetaminophen (APAP), mice were pretreated with increasing doses of APAP for 8 days and challenged on day 9 with normally supralethal doses of APAP. These animals developed minimal hepatotoxicity after a challenge dose with a fourfold increase in LD50 to 1,350 mg/kg. The pretreatment regimen resulted in hepatic changes including: centrilobular localization of 3-(cysteine-S-yl)APAP protein adducts, selective down-regulation of cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) and CYP1A2 that produced the toxic metabolite, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine, higher levels of reduced glutathione (GSH), centrilobular inflammation, and a fourfold increase in hepatocellular proliferation. The protection against the lethal APAP doses afforded by pretreatment is secondary to these changes and to the associated regional shift in the bioactivation of the APAP challenge dose from centrilobular to periportal regions where CYP2E1 is not found, protective GSH is more abundant, and where cell-proliferative responses are better able to sustain repair. This shift in APAP bioactivation results in less-intense covalent binding that is more diffuse and spread uniformly throughout the hepatic lobe, most likely contributing to protection by delaying the early onset of liver injury that has been generally associated with centrilobular localization of the adducts. Intervention of APAP pretreatment-induced cell division in mice with colchicine left them resistant to a 500-mg/kg (normally lethal) dose of APAP, but unable to survive a 1,000-mg/kg APAP challenge dose. The data demonstrate multiple mechanistic components to the protection afforded by APAP pretreatment. Whereas metabolic and physiological changes not dependent on cell proliferation are adequate to protect against 500 mg/kg APAP, these changes plus a potentiated cell-proliferative response are necessary for protection against the supralethal 1,000-mg/kg APAP dose. Furthermore, the data document an uncoupling of the traditional association between covalent binding and toxicity, and suggest that the assessment of toxicity following repeated or chronic APAP exposure must consider altered drug interactions and parameters besides those historically used to assess acute APAP overdose.
Little information is available on acute liver failure (ALF) in the United States. We gathered demographic data retrospectively for a 2-year period from July 1994 to June 1996 on all cases of ALF from 13 hospitals (12 liver transplant centers). Data on the patients included age, hepatic coma grade on admission, presumed cause, transplantation, and outcome. Among 295 patients, 74 (25%) survived spontaneously, 121 (41%) underwent transplantation, and 99 (34%) died without undergoing transplantation. Ninety-two of 121 patients (76%) survived 1 year after transplantation. Acetaminophen overdose was the most frequent cause (60 patients; 20%), followed by cryptogenic/non A non B non C (NANBNC; 15%), idiosyncratic drug reactions (12%), hepatitis B (10%), and hepatitis A (7%). Spontaneous survival rates were highest for patients with acetaminophen overdose (57%) and hepatitis A (40%) and lowest for those with Wilson's disease (no survivors of 18 patients). The transplantation rate was highest for Wilson's disease (17 of 18 patients; 94%) and lowest for autoimmune hepatitis (29%) and acetaminophen overdose (12%). Age did not differ between survivors and nonsurvivors, perhaps reflecting a selection bias for patients transferred to liver transplant centers. Coma grade on admission was not a significant determinant of outcome, but showed a trend toward affecting both survival and transplantation rate. These findings on retrospectively studied patients from the United States differ from those previously gathered in the United Kingdom and France, highlighting the need for further study of trends in each country.