PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7384289

Breast reduction: B technique.

Abstract

The B breast reduction remains an excellent technique. It gives a small scar, well located, and a natural looking breast with good projection (Figs. 5, 6, and 7). In comparison to most classical techniques, the breast has less tendency to become flat with time, and the nipple-areola complex does not migrate up while the breast tissue sags down, but follows, like a nonoperated breast. It certainly is the method of choice in all kinds of mastopexies where it is useless to make long scars when short ones give a more aesthetic result.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Regnault. 1980. Breast reduction: B technique.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198006000-00023

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Comparison of O-linked carbohydrate chains in MUC-1 mucin from normal breast epithelial cell lines and breast carcinoma cell lines. Demonstration of simpler and fewer glycan chains in tumor cells.

MUC-1 mucin is considered to be aberrantly glycosylated in breast, ovary, and other carcinomas in comparison with mucin from corresponding normal tissues. In order to clarify these differences in glycosylation, we have compared the O-linked carbohydrate chains from MUC-1 immunoprecipitated from [3H]GlcN-labeled breast epithelial cell lines (MMSV1-1, MTSV1-7, and HB-2) derived from cells cultured from human milk, with three breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, BT-20, and T47D). Analysis by high pH anion chromatography showed that the normal cell lines had a higher ratio of GlcN/GalN and more complex oligosaccharide profiles than the cancer cell lines. Structural analyses were carried out on the oligosaccharides from MTSV1-7 and T47D MUC-1, and the following structures were proposed. MUC-1 from T47D had rather a simple glycosylation pattern, with NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-3GalNAc-ol, Galbeta1-3GalNAc-ol, and GalNAc-ol predominating; in contrast, MUC-1 from MTSV1-7 had more complex structures, including a number of disialo, core 2 species, i.e. NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbeta1-6[NeuAcalpha2 -3Galbeta1-3]GalNAc- ol and NeuAcalpha2-3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbeta1-6[NeuAcalpha2 -3Galbeta1-4GlcNAcbet a1-3Galbeta1-3]GalNAc-ol. Double-labeling experiments with [3H]GlcN and 14C-aminoacids and analysis of GalNAc or GalNAc-ol:protein ratios in MUC-1 showed that there was also a significant difference in the degree of glycosylation of the mucin between the two cell types. We conclude that MUC-1 from breast cancer cell lines has simpler, and fewer, carbohydrate chains than MUC-1 from normal breast epithelial cells, and that these differences, combined or separately, explain the differential tumor specificity of some MUC-1 antibodies and T cells.

Breast

Tumor progression to the metastatic state involves structural modifications in DNA markedly different from those associated with primary tumor formation.

Wavenumber-absorbance relationships of infrared spectra of DNA analyzed by principal components analysis may be expressed as points in space. Each point represents a highly discriminating measure of DNA structure. Structural modifications of DNA, such as those induced by free radicals, alter vibrational and rotational motion and consequently change the spatial location of the points. Using this technology to analyze breast tumor DNA, we revealed a 94 degrees difference in direction between the progression of normal DNA-->primary tumor DNA and the progression of primary tumor DNA-->metastatic tumor DNA (P < 0.001). This sharp directional change was accompanied by a substantial increase in the structural diversity of the metastatic tumor DNA (P = 0.003), which, on the basis of the volume of the core cluster of points, could comprise as many as 11 x 10(9) different phenotypes. This suggests that the heterogeneity and varied physiological properties known to characterize malignant tumor cell populations may at least partially arise from these diverse phenotypes. The evidence suggests that the progression to the metastatic state involves structural modifications in DNA that are markedly different from the modifications associated with the formation of the primary tumor. Overall, the findings of this and earlier studies imply that the observed DNA alter-ations are a pivotal factor in the etiology of breast cancer and a formidable barrier to overcome in intervention to control the disease. In terms of cancer etiology and prediction, the technology described has potentially wide application to studies in which the structural status of DNA is an important consideration.

Breast