PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7389303

Controlling behavioral techniques in an early intervention program.

Abstract

Traditionally human service programs have lacked guidelines to safeguard the misapplication of aversive behavioral interventions. The Regional Intervention Program, a parent-implemented early intervention service, developed and instituted guidelines to control the potential abuse of behavioral techniques in the program. The guidelines delineate the behavioral interventions the program endorses and the program's position with regard to severe treatment interventions. The policy consists of interventions that can be used on a daily basis, the interventions that are not permitted under any circumstances, the interventions that require permission of the professional staff, and the interventions that may be tried only when specific conditions have been met. These guidelines provide standards and protection for the program's administration and the clients served and could be used as a guide for community mental health center consultants as well as with community mental health programs for the severely or moderately disturbed child.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

V Parrish, P Hester. 1980. Controlling behavioral techniques in an early intervention program.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00778588

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in preventing HIV risk behaviour in injecting drug users.

OBJECTIVE: To consider evidence for the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in reducing the risk of infection with HIV of injecting drug users. METHOD: We reviewed 19 published studies of the effectiveness of individual counselling, HIV testing, group interventions, street outreach, and a 'social' intervention designed to change norms for safer behaviours. RESULTS: Eight of 15 studies that examined behavioural outcomes provided evidence of the effectiveness of an experimental intervention, compared with a control or comparison group. In four of these studies, however, serious design limitations made results difficult to interpret. In the other four studies without design limitations, the success of the experimental interventions may have been due to their greater length and intensity as well as to having been conducted with stable and well-motivated populations. Nine of the 15 studies showed evidence of marked behaviorial changes in both experimental and comparison group(s), with the changes in many cases being sustained for upwards of 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: A close examination of the evidence and competing hypotheses for the pattern of results suggests that participating in evaluation research may itself be a valuable intervention. Implications for the development of interventions include the potential efficacy of health risk assessment. Implications for evaluation of interventions include the need for developing unobtrusive measures and for assessing the impact of behavioural assessments. Despite the large behavioural changes reported in most of the studies, a substantial proportion of subjects receiving interventions reported unacceptably high levels of risk behaviours. New, more potent interventions are needed, such as those designed to change the norms of entire communities of drug users concerning safer injection and safer sex.

Behavior Therapy