PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7397652

Managing the remaining breast.

Abstract

Bilateral breast cancer is discussed as to 1) the criteria for determining whether a cancer in the other breast is primary or metastatic; 2) the incidence of simultaneous and subsequent primary cancers in the second breast and the factors that could account for the reported frequency variance by different authors; 3) the influence that a second primary cancer in the contralateral breast makes on the survival of the patient; 4) the psychologic and physical importance of the remaining breast to the patient; and 5) the management of the other breast using preoperative x-rays and random biopsies as added modalities for detection and reserving prophylactic mastectomy of the remaining breast for those patients at high risk for developing cancer in it with a definition of these risk factors. Forty-two simultaneous primary cancers were found in the other breast in a series of 500 (8.4%) patients undergoing primary therapy for cancer in their first breast of which 19 (45.2%) were invasive, and 23 (54.8%) were non-invasive. Two (0.4%) were detected clinically, 16 (3.2%) by x-rays, and 24 (7.5%) by random biopsies in 321 patients. In a series of 846 patients with potentially curable breast cancer, the absolute ten-year survival rate was 63%. They were operated on before the routine use of preoperative x-rays and random biopsies. Eleven (1.3%) had either clinical or x-ray detected simultaneous cancers in the other breast. Of the remaining 835, 48 had prophylactic mastectomies in which 8 (16.6%) unsuspected cancers were found. In the remaining 787, 70 (8.9%) developed subsequent cancers making a total subsequent rate of 78 of 835 (9.3%).

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H P Leis. 1980-08-15. Managing the remaining breast.. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46%3A4%2B%3C1026%3A%3Aaid-cncr2820461327%3E3.0.co%3B2-l

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

BACKGROUND: In fair-skinned Caucasian populations both the incidence and mortality rates of cutaneous melanoma have been increasing over the past decades. With adjuvant therapies still being under investigation, early detection is the only way to improve melanoma patient survival. The influence of incisional biopsies on melanoma patient survival has been discussed for many years. This study investigates both the influence of diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of residual tumor cells in the re-excision specimen on disease free and overall survival. METHODS: After (partial) removal of a pigmented skin lesion 471 patients were diagnosed with stage I/II melanoma and underwent re-excision and a sentinel node biopsy. All patients were followed prospectively, mean follow up >5 years. Patients were divided according to their diagnostic biopsy type (wide excision biopsy, narrow excision biopsy, excision biopsy with positive margins and incisional biopsy) and the presence of residual tumor cells in their re-excision specimen. Survival analysis was done using Cox's proportional hazard model adjusted for eight important confounders of melanoma patient survival. RESULTS: The diagnostic biopsy was wide in 279 patients, narrow in 109 patients, 52 patients underwent an excision biopsy with positive margins and 31 patients an incisional biopsy. In 41 patients residual tumor cells were present in the re-excision specimen. Both the diagnostic biopsy type and the presence of tumor cells in the re-excision specimen did not influence disease free and overall survival of melanoma patients. CONCLUSIONS: Non-radical diagnostic biopsies do not negatively influence melanoma patient survival.

Biopsy↗