PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7400571

Decision making strategy utilizing priority setting and program data.

Abstract

Formative evaluations, that is recurring evaluations which are primarily intended to yield information on the effectiveness of a program's activities, can be especially valuable to community policymakers. This paper develops a formative evaluation procedure for a community preventive health program. Specifically, the procedure enables one to evaluate the facilities or locations (access points) where the Milwaukee High Blood Pressure Control Program's services are offered. The procedure determines which access points most effectively achieve program objectives, thus providing information to improve program decisions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Haeuser. 1980. Decision making strategy utilizing priority setting and program data.. https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-5-1-152

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Interpractice audit of diagnosis and management of hypertension in primary care: educational intervention and review of medical records.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether peer review medical audit in a primary care setting changes clinical behaviour in relation to the management of hypertension. DESIGN: Review of medical records in general practices to identify hypertensive patients followed up by assessment of the pre-educational and post-educational management of interventions. SETTING: Six general practices in north west London picked at random within defined criteria of geography and size. SUBJECTS: 740 hypertensive patients managed by 25 different general practitioners. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improved level of care in terms of better diagnosis by having at least three blood pressure readings before the start of drug treatment, better level of recordings of lifestyle parameters as shown by the level of recordings of body mass index and total lipid values, and better control of blood pressure and harm minimisation as shown by the level of recordings of urea and electrolyte values. RESULTS: Improvement was noted in the level of recordings of body mass index, total lipid concentrations, and urea and electrolyte values but not in better diagnosis or blood pressure control. CONCLUSION: Clinical behaviour of general practitioners can be changed by peer review but more complex behavioural changes which require the cooperation of the patients and cognitive actions by the general practitioners need further investigation.

Blood Pressure Determination