PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7412633

Teachers in general practice: a comparative study.

Abstract

Thirty-nine randomly selected general practitioners in the Cambridgeshire Health Area were surveyed in an attempt to determine whether there were prior differences between those practitioners who choose to become involved with undergraduate medical students and those who choose not to. Teachers were found to have graduated more recently, subscribe to more journals and were more likely to use medical libraries than non-teachers. All the solo practitioners in the study and two of the four practitioners in two-man groups belonged to a subgroup of non-teachers who had never had students and did not want students in the future. This subfroup also subscribed to fewer journals than the other groups, bought fewer textbooks and used medical libraries less. The only prior differences between teachers and non-teacher that have been demonstrated are year of graduation and type of practice. Other differences could well be attributed to the influence of the students themselves. Studies are needed to clarify this issue, especially as it realates to continuing medical education.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Hay, R M Acheson, B B Reiss, C E Evans. 1980. Teachers in general practice: a comparative study.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1980.tb02274.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Does continuing medical education improve the way physicians conduct their practice?].

OBJECTIVES: Physicians practicing in France are required to participate in continuing education programs in accordance with the code of deontology and the official decree on controlling medical expenditures. We reviewed the literature to analyze the efficacy of such training on the way physicians conduct their practice. METHODS: We examined the following educational methodologies: diffusion of educational documents or guidelines, conferences and presentations, interventions by opinion leaders, direct visits at the physician's office. The analysis was based solely on publications issuing from work considered to be valid in accordance with the Cochrane collaboration: intervention trials, chronological series, before-after studies with control group. RESULTS: The diffusion of educational material or more formal continuing education programs do not appear to have an effect on the way physicians conduct their practice. Interventions by opinion leaders have a demonstrated impact but are rarely judged clinically significant. Visits to the physician's office by specially trained health care workers have an effect but this mode of education is costly. CONCLUSIONS: The conventional strategies, such as simple information diffusion and continuing education programs, developed to promote an evolution of clinical practices appear to be the least effective methodologies.

Education, Medical, Continuing