PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7423473

[Reporting on environmental effects (author's transl)].

Abstract

This form of reporting was started in the USA in 1969. In the Netherlands, the government initiated a discussion on environmental effects in 1974, which resulted in nine trials that were completed in 1979. The enactment of a Reporting Environmental Effects Act will have to be taken into account in the future. A report on environmental effects is a public document announcing an intention to act and a description of the anticipated effects of this action on the environment. This document is drawn up for the purposes of the decision that will have to be reached with regard to this intention (issuing a permit by the authorities). A report on environmental effects will be required when extensive or far-reaching effects on the environment of that which is intended can be expected. This expectation may be based, among others, on the extent and character of emissions and existent activities in the area in which the company intends to establish itself. Organized farming will have to take into account the fact that experts in the field of environmental health are engaged as fully qualified technicians in drawing up the report on environmental effects.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J Tesink. 1980-09-15. [Reporting on environmental effects (author's transl)].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7423473/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Retained foreign bodies from the view of the OR nurse].

Patient safety in the operating room is of high priority for the surgical team and for all healthcare workers involved. Counting procedures contribute to minimizing potential risks for the patients, especially in preventing them from leaving the operating room with retained, unintended foreign bodies. A total of 64% of operating room nurses involved in a survey are reported as having been involved in a surgical procedure in which the correct count prevented foreign bodies from being left in the patient. In addition, the strengths and potential weak points of the counting procedures could be identified. The results of the survey and drafts for a standard counting control as well as procedural recommendations are presented for discussion. A recommendation can be provided for each surgical department in order to check their own counting methods for avoiding potential risks.

Documentation↗