PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7430968

Immediate memory for spatial location.

Abstract

Performance characteristics in a spatial-location task were examined nonmetrically. In Experiment 1, subjects reproduced the location of a dot either from immediate memory or while actually looking at the dot. Independent analyses of accuracy and the direction of incorrect reproductions yielded evidence for a fast-acting locational-memory process that may be distinct both from locational-perception processes and from response-bias processes. In Experiment 2, three different borders were used to vary the distance between the dot location and the border. Locational-memory accuracy increased as this distance decreased. Incorrect reproductions tended to occur toward rather than away from the border, and the robustness of this effect decreased for dot locations nearer to the border. Due to our nonmetric approach, the above conclusions are generalizable to all psychological conceptions whose spatial distances are monotonically related to the external spatial distances investigated here. A weighted-distortion theory of memory for spatial location is proposed to account for these and other findings.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T O Nelson, S Chaiklin. 1980. Immediate memory for spatial location.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7430968/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

The right questions to assess materials. Selecting distance learning material.

1. Distance learning provides real educational opportunities, equal to and complementary with, traditional taught programme approaches. 2. Important questions to ask about distance learning include relevance to practice, accessibility, quality assurance, assessment and value for money. 3. Distance learning need not be lonely and isolating, and can provide education that travels with students--important in today's professional context.

Distance Perception

Spatial scale dependent in-phase and anti-phase directional biases in the perception of self-organized motion patterns.

A long row of evenly spaced dots is displaced on successive frames by half the distance between the dots. Although these stimuli are directionally ambiguous, spatially and temporally coherent unidirectional and oscillatory motion patterns are perceived as a result of the temporal persistence of competing in-phase and anti-phase directional biases, respectively. The perceiver's spatial scale is critical is determining whether dots are near enough to favor an in-phase bias or far enough apart to favor an anti-phase bias. The results are explained by a differential-gradient model of cooperative interaction, which specifies that the strength of facilitating (excitatory) interactions among motion detectors with similar directional selectivity falls off with distance at a greater rate than the strength of competing inhibiting interactions.

Distance Perception

How accurate is size and distance perception for very far terrestrial objects? Function and causality.

This study investigated absolute estimation of size and distance for natural and artificial objects at viewing distances of 1.1-15.3 km (Experiments 1 and 2) and 0.4-5.0 m (Experiment 3). The main results were that, regardless of distance range, size and distance estimates (S' and D') were related to objective size and distance (S and D), respectively, by a power function with an exponent of unity, but great individual differences in exponent were obtained for the far objects. The ratio S'/D' was reasonably represented by S'/D' = K theta n and S'/D' = tan(a theta +b), rather than S'/D' = tan theta, where theta is the visual angle. Partial correlations were obtained to examine whether (1) apparent size is determined by taking apparent distance into account or (2) both apparent size and apparent distance are determined directly by external stimuli. The combined data for the far objects and the data for the close objects showed that there were high correlations between S and S' and between D and D' and a low correlation between D' and S'. The data of Experiment 2 showed that both D' and S' were highly correlated with S, D, and theta, and there was a high positive correlation between D' and S'. It was suggested that the direct-perception model is valid under some situations, but the taking-into-account model is not supported in any set of data.

Distance Perception