PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7435376

Passive dosimetry using detector tubes.

R H Hill·D A Fraser
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Detector tubes for toluene were cut to produce a nominal 0.5 cm orifice above the indicator material, and exposed to known vapor concentrations. The time needed to reach a pre-determined stain length by simple diffusion was measured. Calibration charts were prepared for time versus concentration for a 1 mm stain, as well as for various stain lengths. Tests were performed to determine the effect of increasing the orifice length and of diffusion through the glass wool plug. Each of these parameters resulted in less reliable concentration measurements than tubes of relatively shorter orifice length having no glass wool plug. Diffusion theory was used to develop theoretical calibration charts for comparison with experimental results, with the former underestimating necessary for appearance of the experimentally observed stains. The use of detector tubes having an orifice length of 0.5 cm as passive dosimeters is shown to be highly feasible based on experimental results.

Explore related subjects

Equipment and SuppliesGasesMathematicsMethodsTolueneJournal ArticleResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R H Hill, D A Fraser. 1980. Passive dosimetry using detector tubes.. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298668091425563

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

An impact assessment of the European medical device regulations implementation - the current status quo.

BACKGROUND: This research aims to assess the current impact of the medical and in-vitro diagnostic devices regulations (MDR/IVDR) on the device industry in the EU, under the lens of postimplementation and the amending regulation, and in advance of the final transition to the IVDR/MDR in the future. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A quantitative survey was administered to a diverse cohort of medical device enterprises, ranging from micro to large organizations. RESULTS: The survey indicates that the MDR/IVDR has harmed innovation, leading many manufacturers to seek initial device approval and launch elsewhere before in Europe. There is evidence that some manufacturers have rationalized their existing product portfolios and removed devices from the market as they stated they would in previous industry surveys. The MDR/IVDR has been shown to negatively impact manufacturers, with increased costs related to notified body (NB) fees, maintaining and updating documentation, recertification fees, and hiring additional staff. CONCLUSION: This study provides a current status of the effects of MDR/IVDR on manufacturers and finds that despite amending regulations and other interventions taken by the EU to mitigate regulatory burden, ensure product availability, and address stakeholder concerns, the EU is no longer the market of choice for new products.

Equipment and Supplies↗