PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7446542

Interpretation of research data: selected statistical procedures.

Abstract

Selected statistical procedures used in the analysis of research data are presented. The relationship of significance testing to research hypotheses is explained in terms of tests of differences and correlation. Also, the differences, assumptions, and advantages and disadvantages of parametric and nonparametric statistics are discussed. With regard to each statistic presented, emphasis is placed on the hypotheses that would be tested, the kinds of data for which the statistic is appropriate, the method of calculation, and how to test for "significance." The selected statistical procedures include the Student's t-test and chi square. An explanation of the concept of correlation is provided, and several correlation coefficients are discussed, including the Pearson r, Spearman rho, Kendall's tau, the point biserial, biserial, phi coefficient, and contingency coefficient. Pharmacists must know basic statistical procedures in order to be able to effectively interpret the results of published research or to appropriately analyze data that have been collected in their own research endeavors.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R A Jackson. 1980. Interpretation of research data: selected statistical procedures.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7446542/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical pharmacokinetic data of racemic drugs obtained by the indirect method following precolumn diastereomer formation: is the influence of racemization during chiral derivatization significant?

This report reviews the stereoselective data of a number of racemic drugs (n = 17) obtained from indirect chiral method (via diastereomer formation) in comparison to similar data generated by the application of a direct chiral method. While it was noted that the indirect method still continued to be used to characterize the stereoselective disposition of racemic drugs, the present review critically evaluates the issue of racemization that has the potential to skew the stereoselective data obtained from the indirect method. The review describes various remedies to counter and/or minimize the impact of racemization on the final outcome of the stereoselective analysis by the indirect method. On the basis of this review it could be concluded that the indirect method is a viable and important tool for gathering stereoselective data of racemic drugs used in medical practice as well for those racemic drugs still in discovery and developmental stages.

Methods↗