PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7454186

Functional assessment for heavy physical labor.

Abstract

It is proposed that assessment of a worker who performs manual labor must include specific tests of physical capability. Such tests must meet certain criteria to be accepted as medically, economically and legally justified. The medical and economic justification for such tests is recognized by all concerned with controlling the excessive costs and human suffering associated with over-exertion strain/sprain injury and illness in industry. The legal basis for such tests is not well established and will not exist until a documented history of success or failure is developed in the courts for different types of tests. It is hoped that as various tests are developed by medical departments the criteria stated in the first part of this article will be of assistance. As to the status of isometric strength testing for employee selection and placement, it is being implemented as part of the medical examination in a number of large industries as an experimental medical procedure. Data are being continually gathered to further validate and refine the procedures. It is discussed in this contest as one of several methods which needs to be considered and evaluated to reduce musculoskeletal injury and illness in industry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D B Chaffin. 1981. Functional assessment for heavy physical labor.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7454186/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Indicators for occupational health surveillance.

Each year, millions of the estimated 140 million U.S. workers are injured on the job or become ill from exposure to hazards at work. These work-related injuries and illnesses result in substantial human and economic costs for workers, employers, and society; estimated direct and indirect costs of work-related injuries and illnesses are approximately $170 billion annually. In 1998, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and CDC's National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) convened a work group that identified priority occupational health conditions to be placed under surveillance, addressed cross-cutting surveillance concerns, and made recommendations regarding the role of states in a comprehensive nationwide surveillance system for work-related disease, injuries, and hazards. CSTE recommendations led to the generation of 19 occupational health indicators (OHIs) and one Employment Demographic Profile, which were developed during 2001-2003. The OHIs complement other guidelines for state-based occupational health surveillance to address overall state and national goals to improve public health. These OHIs are intended to help states build occupational health capacity by providing them with tools to collect and generate important, basic information concerning the occupational health status of the state population and to identify areas in which to focus prevention efforts. In 2005, CSTE released a report compiling OHI data from 13 states. NIOSH provides funding for the OHIs because they are now a required component of state-based cooperative agreements for occupational health surveillance. This report introduces the OHIs and describes CSTE's approach to developing this new occupational health surveillance tool.

Accidents, Occupational↗

[Lies and Latin].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Accidents, Occupational↗