PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7461614

Defining and counting the chronically mentally ill.

Abstract

The shifts in the pattern and locus of mental health care arising from the deinstitutionalization movement have resulted in a lack of definitive information on the scope of the problem of chronic mental illness. In addition, there is a lack of consensus on the boundaries that define the chronically mentally ill population, boundaries that can guide national policy-makers in a more scientific assessment of needs. In a national study following up the recommendations of the President's Commission on Mental Health, the authors developed a detailed definition of the chronically mentally ill population based on diagnosis, disability, duration of illness, and the institutional and community settings in which chronic mental patients may be found. They used prevalence data from a number of sources to arrive at a national estimate of between 1.7 million and 2.4 million in the target population, including 900,000 in institutions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H H Goldman, A A Gattozzi, C A Taube. 1981. Defining and counting the chronically mentally ill.. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.32.1.21

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Iron regulation.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Chronic Disease↗

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗