PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7468791

Mandibular torus morphology.

Abstract

The morphology of the mandibular torus was examined, and comparisons were made between a Medieval Norse skeletal population from Greenland and a 14th to 17th century Greenland Eskimo skeletal series. Three parameters were analyzed: degree of development (on a 4-point scale), position and length, and surface morphology according to the number of knobs, or lobuli. It was found that the Eskimos have a high frequency of weakly developed tori and no cases of the extreme development, while over 20% of the Norsemen had tori in the "extreme" category. The Norse torus was generally found to be longer than that of the Eskimos, and both groups exhibited a slight asymmetry between the sides, the torus on the left side tending to be longer and more forward in position than the right. A great difference was found in surface morphology. The Norse torus is in general very irregular, while the Eskimo torus is rather smooth. These differences are believed to be genetically determined.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B J Sellevold. 1980. Mandibular torus morphology.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330530411

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Telemedicine in Greenland: the case for and against implementation.

Greenland has a population of approximately 55,000 spread over an enormous stretch of coast. Conditions for patient transport are often hostile due to weather and the availability of materials. The health clinics on the coast are wholly dependent on the ability to transport in cases of serious illness or injury, as no manpower or facilities for intensive treatment or care exist outside of populated centers. A large proportion of the population lives far away from the centers, and due to their closeness to nature, these people have a high incidence of injuries. For these reasons, installation of the highest possible level of technological knowledge transfer seems highly appropriate. However, technology proficiency on the part of health personnel in the outlying areas is low; indeed, the level of reading skills is not satisfactory in all cases. There is furthermore a significant language barrier. The case for telemedicine in this setting is clear in technical terms, but murky at best in the manpower sense. The final argument will be financial means, which must be found by savings in other settings, e.g., evacuations and treatment in distant settings. A current effort to increase the information base to support decision making in this sphere is presented.

Greenland