PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7472727

Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects.

P Milleding·U Ortengren·S Karlsson
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Due to their inertness and unsurpassed aesthetic properties, ceramic materials are increasingly used as inlay materials. Based on a questionnaire, the frequency and character of complications related to ceramic inlay therapy were assessed and some important pitfalls and clinical relevant factors discussed. A majority of the dentists performed between 1 and 10 ceramic inlays per month using several different ceramic materials. As many as 85% of the dentists had observed complications in connection with ceramic inlays. Most frequency reported was hypersensitivity of a transient nature (15%). The material revealed an overall inlay fracture frequency of 5%, but the individual variations were high. Tooth fracture, loss of retention and other complications such as secondary caries, endodontic envolvement, colour mismatch and a surface and edge deterioration occurred with a varying but lower frequency. Failure analysis revealed a large number of causative factors among which cavity and inlay design, bonding procedures, selection of luting material and proper case selection were regarded as the most important. Due consideration to the strength of remaining tooth substance was found to be important in reducing the problem of hypersensitivity and the risk of tooth and inlay fracture.

Explore related subjects

Dental CariesDental CementsDental Marginal AdaptationDental PorcelainDental Stress AnalysisDentin SensitivityFemaleHumansInlaysMaleProsthesis ColoringProsthesis FailureSurface PropertiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvival AnalysisTooth FracturesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Milleding, U Ortengren, S Karlsson. 1995. Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb01051.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence for dental caries detection: An umbrella review.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed as a tool to improve dental caries detection across imaging modalities; however, its clinical value remains uncertain. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and critically appraise systematic reviews evaluating AI for caries detection and diagnosis. An umbrella review was conducted following PRIOR guidance (PROSPERO CRD420261340728). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to 15 March 2026. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA). Seventeen systematic reviews were included, of which five reported diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses using bivariate or HSROC models. Across these meta-analyses, pooled sensitivity ranged from 0.76 to 0.94 and specificity from 0.85 to 0.91. Most systems were based on deep learning models applied to bitewing radiographs and intraoral photographs. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed in imaging modalities, lesion thresholds, analytical tasks, and evaluation metrics. In addition, a high degree of overlap across reviews and recurrent methodological limitations, including reliance on retrospective datasets, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting, substantially weaken the reliability of the evidence. Although AI models demonstrate high diagnostic performance under experimental conditions, current evidence does not support their use as stand-alone diagnostic tools. Their clinical applicability remains limited, and implementation should be restricted to decision-support contexts until robust prospective validation demonstrates meaningful impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed2007

Hardness, elasticity, and ultrastructure of bonded sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin.

Biomechanical properties of bonded dentin are important factors for resin restoration. We evaluated the hardness and elastic modulus of bonded sound and caries-affected primary tooth dentin using a one-step adhesive system, and observed the microstructure of the bonded interface. Six sound and six carious primary teeth were used. For sound teeth, flat occlusal dentin surfaces were prepared with a water-cooled high-speed diamond bur. For carious teeth, infected dentin was stained with a caries detector and removed with a water-cooled low-speed round steel bur and hand instruments. The prepared dentin was bonded with One-Up Bond F Plus (Tokuyama Dental Co., Tokyo, Japan). The resin-dentin interface and dentin beneath the interface were measured with a nano-indentation tester and observed with SEM and TEM. For both the carious and sound teeth, there was no significant difference between the hardness of the interfacial dentin and dentin 10-80 microm beneath the interface. However, the Young's modulus of the interfacial dentin was significantly lower than the dentin 40-80 microm (carious teeth) or 50-80 microm (sound teeth) beneath the interface. Both the hardness and Young's modulus of the interfacial dentin were not significantly different between the carious and sound teeth. Compared to the sound dentin, the hybrid layer on the caries-affected dentin was thicker and exhibited more complicated morphologic features. The thickness of the hybrid layers was generally less than 1 microm.

Dental Caries↗
PubMed2006

Arresting caries.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Dental Caries↗