PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7475495

Abnormal uterine bleeding.

J C Jennings
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Physicians who care for female patients cannot avoid the frequent complaint of abnormal uterine bleeding. Knowledge of the disorders that cause this problem can prevent serious consequences in many patients and improve the quality of life for many others. The availability of noninvasive and minimally invasive diagnostic studies and minimally invasive surgical treatment has revolutionized management of abnormal uterine bleeding. Similar to any other disorder, the extent to which a physician manages abnormal uterine bleeding depends on his or her own level of comfort. When limitations of either diagnostic or therapeutic capability are encountered, consultation and referral should be used to the best interest of patients.

Explore related subjects

Dilatation and CurettageFemaleHumansMenstrual CycleUterine HemorrhageJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Jennings. 1995. Abnormal uterine bleeding.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30006-2

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1992

[Improved diagnosis of endometrial cancer].

Over the last few decades, carcinoma of the endometrium, the most common genital carcinoma in women, has become more and more important. For a long time, intensive efforts to improve its early detection remained unsuccessful. Not until the introduction of vaginal ultrasonography was a decisive step forward achieved in the early detection of this carcinoma on the basis of an assessment of endometrial thickness. In clinical studies, measurement of endometrial thickness by intravaginal ultrasonography has proved an outstanding parameter for the early detection of endometrial neoplasia, even in asymptomatic postmenopausal women.

Dilatation and Curettage↗
PubMed1992

[Hysteroscopically guided endometrial destruction in the treatment of menorrhagia].

Until recently, hysterectomy has been the alternative method of treatment in cases of premenopausal menorrhagia where it has not proved possible to obtain satisfactory regulation of the haemorrhage by medical means. Within recent years, a series of hysteroscopic methods have been developed for selective destruction of the endometrium by means of neodymium-laser, electroresection and coagulation. Compared with hysterectomy, hysteroscopic destruction of the endometrium appears to be a much more rapid, simpler and cheaper form of treatment of menorrhagia and appears to be associated with considerably fewer complications. The duration of hospitalization and the period of convalescence can be reduced considerably but, primarily, a large group of women can avoid hysterectomy. As yet, no controlled investigations of selective destruction of the endometrium as compared with conventional hysterectomy are available. There are no comparative investigations of the different methods nor of the long-term sequelae after destruction of the endometrium. This method of treatment has hitherto only been employed to a limited extent in Denmark. Coordination of the activities in this field in connection with establishing this form of treatment in Denmark should be encouraged.

Dilatation and Curettage↗