PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7481369

Lasers in rectosigmoid tumors.

Abstract

Over a 14-year period, 746 patients were treated at the Lille Laser Center for rectosigmoid tumor. Two hundred seventy-two patients were treated for palliation of symptoms from rectosigmoid cancer and 474 patients were treated for a benign rectosigmoid villous adenoma. The immediate success rate and complication rate were 85% and 2%, respectively, for patients with advanced cancer, and 92.8% and 1.8% for those with a villous adenoma. Patients with an advanced cancer remained functionally improved during a 10.1-month average period after initial improvement. The recurrence rate after initial treatment for villous adenomas was 18% during a 29.7-month average follow-up. Immediate results were influenced by reason for treatment, initial symptoms, and circumferential extension for patients with a cancer, and only by circumferential extension for patients with a villous adenoma. Long-term results were influenced by reason for treatment and circumferential extension for patients with cancer, and by reason for treatment, initial histology and localization for patients with a villous adenoma. Laser treatment provided relief of symptoms in inoperable patients with advanced rectosigmoid carcinomas. Because treatment is long and difficult and the cancer rate is high, endoscopic laser should be limited in patients with a circumferential villous adenoma to non-surgical candidates. The risk of complication after surgery (some being fatal) has to be balanced against the risk of undetected carcinoma and the indication for endoscopic laser treatment should be discussed case by case.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J M Brunetaud, V Maunoury, D Cochelard. Lasers in rectosigmoid tumors.. https://doi.org/10.1002/ssu.2980110407

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Colorectal screening after polypectomy: a national survey study of primary care physicians.

BACKGROUND: Recommendations by primary care physicians for colorectal screening after polypectomy will influence rates of colonoscopy in open-access systems that do not require consultation by a gastroenterologist before colonoscopy. OBJECTIVE: To determine the surveillance recommendations of primary care physicians after polypectomy and compare them with recommendations from the U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study of physicians. SETTING: United States. PARTICIPANTS: A random sample of 500 physicians from the American College of Physicians and 500 physicians from the American Academy of Family Physicians, obtained by using a mail survey. MEASUREMENTS: Physicians were asked when they would recommend repeated colonoscopy for a hypothetical 55-year-old man with no family history of colorectal cancer after the following 6 results on colonoscopy: hyperplastic polyp, one 6-mm tubular adenoma, two 6-mm tubular adenomas, one 12-mm tubulovillous adenoma, one 12-mm tubular adenoma with focal high-grade dysplasia, and no polyp but a previous tubular adenoma. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 57% (568 physicians). Of the respondents, 48% were internists and 52% were family practitioners. Sixty-one percent of respondents would survey a hyperplastic polyp in 5 years or less, 71% would survey a single tubular adenoma in 3 years or less, and 80% would survey 2 tubular adenomas in 3 years or less. LIMITATIONS: The results are based on physicians' self-reported practices from clinical vignettes and may not match actual practice. CONCLUSION: Primary care physicians recommend postpolypectomy colonoscopic surveillance more frequently than is recommended by practice guidelines, especially if the colonoscopy showed a hyperplastic polyp or a single small adenoma.

Adenoma, Villous↗