PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7490185

Use of fibrinolytic agents to coat wire implants to decrease infection. An animal model.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Infection is a serious complication of metallic prosthesis implantation and may necessitate removal of the prosthesis. This study uses an animal model to evaluate the effects of coating stainless steel wire implants with fibrinolytic agents to prevent infection after bacterial contamination. METHODS: Three types of steel wire implants were used: plain stainless steel, heparin-coated steel, and urokinase-heparin-coated steel. Wire implants were incubated in a known concentration of Staphylococcus epidermidis and placed into the subcutaneous tissues of three groups of anesthetized hamsters. The implants and surrounding tissues were excised after 1 week and submitted for quantitative cultures. RESULTS: Using 100 organisms as the upper allowable limit to categorize abscesses as noninfected, the following rates of noninfectivity were observed: group 1 (control), 0% noninfected; group 2 (heparin-coated wire), 40% noninfected; and group 3 (urokinase-heparin-coated wire), 50% noninfected. The noninfectivity rates of groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher than the rate of group 1 (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between groups 2 and 3 (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Both the heparin-coated and urokinase-heparin-coated wire exhibited significantly decreased infection rates compared with uncoated wire; the heparin coating may inhibit bacterial adherence. The urokinase coating of the heparin-coated wire appears to further decrease the infection rate, but not to a statistically significant degree.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Nakamoto, J R Haaga, P Bove, K Merritt, D Y Rowland. 1995. Use of fibrinolytic agents to coat wire implants to decrease infection. An animal model.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004424-199506000-00003

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Minimally invasive treatment of renal abscess.

PURPOSE: We critically evaluated the most appropriate management of renal abscesses, and identified the set of patients that most benefits from conservative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed charts regarding discharge diagnoses, radiological studies, pathological specimens, epidemiology factors and outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using loglinear and covariant analysis. RESULTS: Nine years of experience (1984 to 1993) at 2 affiliated hospitals (1 public and 1 private) were reviewed. A total of 52 patients with renal abscesses was identified with a followup rate of 98%. In immunocompetent patients 100% of small abscesses (less than 3 cm.) managed by antibiotics and observation alone resolved. Of medium abscesses (3 to 5 cm.) treated with percutaneous abscess drainage alone 92% resolved. Large abscesses (greater than 5 cm.) often required more than 1 percutaneous drainage procedure (33%) or adjunct open surgical intervention (37%). Statistical analysis revealed that no single treatment modality yielded a superior resolution rate or shorter hospitalization for abscesses stratified by size, patient age or treatment instituted early (1984 to 1993) or late (1992 and 1993) in the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that percutaneous drainage is as effective as open surgery for large and medium renal abscesses. Small abscesses may be effectively treated with a course of intravenous antibiotic therapy. A treatment algorithm is reported.

Abscess