PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7493270

[Nursing records].

View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The good evolution of intensive care demands an intense and fluent communication. It is important for the attention to patients as well as for a better exploitation of the experience obtained day after day to have a written register of all the data, results, judgements and relevant actions which are being performed.

Explore related subjects

Critical CareHumansNursing AssessmentNursing RecordsEnglish AbstractJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

[Nursing records].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7493270/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2004

Leapfrog and critical care: evidence- and reality-based intensive care for the 21st century.

In 2000, the Business Roundtable published its Leapfrog report, which contained suggestions for improving administration of critical care. The Leapfrog Group intends to influence health care policy by pressuring insurers and hospitals to implement its guidelines, and both internists and intensivists are likely to be affected if these recommendations are realized. This article outlines the Leapfrog standards for critical care and examines critically the evidence used to justify them. Aside from the guideline that all critically ill patients should be cared for by intensivists, Leapfrog's standards for critical care are based either on weak or no scientific evidence. Rather, most of the guidelines are grounded in common sense and rational extrapolation of the data; as such, they are a reasonable starting point for debate by physicians and policymakers about optimal methods of achieving intensivist-guided care of critically ill patients.

Critical Care↗