PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7493702

Breech presentation in Spain, 1992: a collaborative study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The goals of the present work were to study the incidence of breech deliveries in Spain, the causes for breech presentation and its management and the incidence of cesarean sections and its correlation with the perinatal mortality rates among different centers. STUDY DESIGN: Data from 102,038 deliveries, 3829 of which were singleton breech deliveries attended in 1992, were obtained from 40 hospital centers located in different autonomic communities of Spain and analyzed using a computer statistical package (R-sigma, Horus Hardware). RESULTS: The incidence of breech deliveries was 3.8%, although this proportion varied between different centers and regions. Up to 18% of the cases occurred in preterm. The most frequent causes were prematurity and uterine malformations. In its management, an increase in the tendency to perform elective cesarean section was noticed. The incidence of cesarean sections reached 14.9% of the total and 67.9% in breech deliveries. Perinatal mortality rate in breech deliveries was more than four times that of all deliveries, according to national standards, and more than three times according to international standards (47.8 versus 11.8 x 1000, and 24.7 versus 8 x 1000, respectively). The intrapartum and neonatal mortality in breech deliveries was 13 x 1000. No correlation between incidence of cesarean sections and perinatal mortality rates was found. Primiparity, deflexed head, macrosomia and prematurity were the most decisive parameters to indicate a cesarean section. Neither the external cephalic version nor the total breech extraction were common procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of breech deliveries is variable between different centers (1.7%-5.1%) and Spanish regions (3.3%-4.3%), with a mean of 3.8% in overall and 11.4% in preterm deliveries. There is a tendency to perform cesarean sections, especially in primiparae. There is no correlation between the percentage of cesarean sections in each center and the perinatal mortality rate. External cephalic version and total breech extraction were uncommon procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

P Acién. 1995. Breech presentation in Spain, 1992: a collaborative study.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-2115(95)02166-5

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.

Aggregate databases are increasingly being used to evaluate appropriateness of care, and, for cesarean sections, Anderson and Lomas' International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision (ICD-9), coding hierarchy is a widely used tool. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of the hierarchy and expand its applicability to repeat cesareans. Hospital records of 1885 singleton cesareans were reviewed. Clinical indications and ICD-9 hierarchical codes were concordant for 83% of primary and 86% of repeat cesareans; modification allowed elective repeat cesareans to be distinguished from indicated procedures. The Anderson and Lomas ICD-9 hierarchy is a valid tool for assessing indications for cesarean. The current modification improves its clinical utility and expands its application to repeat procedures.

Breech Presentation