PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7512415

Towards an optimal teaching programme for supportive care.

Abstract

The changes occurring in medical education have led to important principles being identified that are relevant to teaching in supportive care. Many of these principles are already an integral part of the Newcastle, NSW, Medical Faculty undergraduate course and are being applied to the teaching of oncology and supportive care. The same principles can be applied to curriculum development and implementation in other settings. A curriculum is proposed that builds on a general background of oncology knowledge. Factual knowledge is limited to the precarious clinical problems requiring optimal supportive care, the priority oncology syndromes, palliative care and principles of psychosocial and behavioural science interventions. The curriculum also includes critical reasoning, special skills including counselling, communication, self-directed learning, team management, health-service resources and structure, and relevant management skills. To implement the curriculum, consideration must be given to teaching methods (teaching in context and in small groups, problem-based learning and problem solving). The needs of students, quality of the teachers, when and where the teaching and learning will occur and methods of assessment should also be considered to ensure the curriculum can be used optimally.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J F Forbes. 1994. Towards an optimal teaching programme for supportive care.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00355234

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A professional response to demands for accountability: practical recommendations regarding ethical aspects of patient care. Working Group on Accountability.

Forceful new demands for accountability in medicine are arising from many interested parties. To maintain professional standards, physicians need to establish which demands are desirable and which are not. We adopt a model of stratified accountability that includes three major components: the accountable parties, the subject matter, and the processes for accountability. To begin describing the model, we focus on physicians and health care institutions. We focus on the ethical dimensions of medical practice, both because the difficulty of measuring such behaviors makes this a test case for accountability and because of the importance of ethical standards in maintaining patient trust. We first identify eight widely endorsed content areas for accountability in ethical conduct: medical decision making, confidentiality, fiduciary obligations (including conflicts of interest), responsibilities arising from patient vulnerability, personal standards, equity among patients, cultural representation, and procedures for resolving dilemmas. We then identify the currently most valid and reliable methods for assessing conduct: surveys among all involved parties, testing methods used for accreditation, limited audits, publication of policy, and careful use of report cards. A prototypical survey and report card are illustrated. However, we also note the need for improved accountability assessment methods. We next identify mechanisms for taking responsibility: sharing information, exchanging perspectives, making adjustments, and enforcing standards when necessary. Finally, because this report only begins to describe a small part of the accountability model, we urge explicit identification and development of professional standards for accountability in the many other areas of medicine.

Clinical Competence