PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7512903

Antacids. Indications and limitations.

Abstract

Antacids have served us well for over a century. In terms of peptic ulcer disease, the attitude in the late 1950s to 1970s that antacids should be taken only on demand was unjustified and erroneous. 13 recent endoscopic controlled studies have confirmed the efficacy of antacids in the healing of duodenal ulcer, achieving about 75% healing in 4 weeks. The efficacy of antacids in promoting gastric ulcer healing has been less well studied and the results are controversial. The most appropriate and economical antacid regimens for the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease should include tablets or liquid that have acid neutralising capacity of 400 mmol/day given at least an hour after meals. As a long term therapy, antacids appear to work, but need be taken in multiple daily doses, a regimen which is unlikely to meet with long term patient compliance. Patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disorders or pregnancy-related reflux have also benefited from the usage of antacids ad libitum. Early previous studies have clearly demonstrated the efficacy of antacids in reducing gastro-oesophageal reflux and healing of reflux oesophagitis. The acidity of the gastric contents is the major determining factor in the outcome of the aspiration pneumonitis occurring during delivery. The prophylactic use of antacids during delivery has helped to reduce the severity of this complication. Similarly, the prophylactic administration of antacid aiming to maintain gastric pH between 3.5 to 7.0 has resulted in significant reduction of bleeding due to stress associated ulcers and/or erosive haemorrhagic gastritis in critically ill patients. Antacid therapy, however, is controversial in the management of nonulcer dyspepsia or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug related upper gastrointestinal mucosal damage. Undoubtedly, antacids have major roles to play in the treatment of gastric acid related disorders. They have clear advantages and disadvantages when compared with the antisecretory agents. New proton pump inhibitors in particular have certainly superseded antacids and even the H2-receptor antagonists in many respects. However, the long term safety record of antacids remains unsurpassed by any of the new antisecretory agents.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C K Ching, S K Lam. 1994. Antacids. Indications and limitations.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003495-199447020-00006

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Meta-analysis: the efficacy of over-the-counter gastro-oesophageal reflux disease therapies.

BACKGROUND: Over-the-counter histamine-2 receptor antagonists, antacids and alginate/antacids are commonly used for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. AIM: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of related treatment trials. METHODS: We performed a systematic search and abstraction of randomized, placebo-controlled trials conducted during 1972-2005. Study quality was measured by the Jadad score (0-5). Results were pooled using random effects model. RESULTS: Ten trials (n = 3442, placebo = 2940; Jadad score 3.5) showed a higher response with histamine-2 receptor antagonists in regard to complete relief of heartburn, symptomatic improvement, and episodes requiring rescue antacids. The absolute benefit increase was 10-12% and relative benefit increase was 19-41%. Four trials (n = 578, placebo = 577; Jadad score 3.5) showed a trend in favour of antacids in symptomatic improvement (absolute benefit increase 8%, 95% CI: 0-16%; relative benefit increase 0.11) and requirement of rescue antacids (OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84). Four trials (n = 146, placebo = 138; Jadad score 3.8) found alginate/antacid combination superior to placebo in symptomatic improvement (absolute benefit increase 26%, 95% CI: 12%-41%, relative benefit increase 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: Over-the-counter medications are effective in treating symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Compared with the placebo response, which ranged between 37% and 64%, the relative benefit increase was up to 41% with histamine-2 receptor antagonists, 60% with alginate/antacid combinations, and 11% with antacids.

Antacids↗

Nocturnal asthma.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To examine recent advancements of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of nocturnal asthma. RECENT FINDINGS: In a large cross-sectional survey, the prevalence of nocturnal symptoms was 60%. Forty-two percent of patients who completed the study did not declare nocturnal symptoms that were detected by physicians. A recent study including 47 individuals with nocturnal and nonnocturnal asthma showed that allele genotype Gly16 was significantly higher in the nocturnal asthma group (72%) compared with the nonnocturnal asthma group (54%). A randomized double-blind study of nocturnal asthma with esomeprazole improved the peak expiratory flow rate in individuals with both nocturnal asthma and gastroesophageal reflux disease. Of patients with nocturnal asthma and snoring, 48% had obstructive sleep apnea. After continuous positive airway pressure treatment, there was significant improvement of asthma nighttime symptom scores; however, no significant difference in lung functions was observed. SUMMARY: Nocturnal symptoms in asthma are frequently underdiagnosed. Obstructive sleep apnea may be prevalent in nocturnal asthma. The Gly16 polymorphism of the beta2-receptor is common in nocturnal asthma. Gastric suppression treatment in patients with both gastroesophageal reflux disease and nocturnal asthma improved the peak expiratory flow rate. Continuous positive airway pressure improves nocturnal symptoms but not lung function tests.

Antacids↗