PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 7539641

Future developments in endoscopic imaging.

Abstract

Endoscopic imaging capabilities have significantly improved over the past 10 years. Improvements in fibreoptic technology have made possible the development of very thin endoscopes that can directly visualize the biliary and pancreatic ducts. The application of the CCD to endoscopy has made electronic endoscopy possible, and holds promise for stereoendoscopy. The ability to digitize endoscopic images can be developed to store, transmit, magnify, enhance and otherwise manipulate data obtained during endoscopy, and will probably be utilized routinely in the future. Laser and ultrasound technology are likely to enhance significantly our ability to examine ultrastructural aspects of gastrointestinal organs and surrounding tissues, and may play an important role in cancer surveillance programs. Vital staining techniques are likely to find widespread use in early cancer detection programmes, and may be useful to follow prospectively lesions observed or treated during endoscopy. Finally, the new developments in 'virtual imaging' may find applications in the field of gastrointestinal endoscopy and other 'minimally invasive' surgical procedures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K V Kowdley, F E Silverstein. 1995. Future developments in endoscopic imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-3528(95)90076-4

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Diagnosis of lymphostatic edema of the extremities].

The diagnosis of lymphedema and its combination forms can be established with the aid of basic diagnostic measures (patient's medical history, inspection, palpation). Imaging techniques are indicated only when clinical examination falls to provide an unequivocal diagnosis, or when an accurate functional and morphological status of the disorder is required, for example in early stages of lymphedema and combination forms such as phlebolymphedema or lipolymphedema, etc. At present, the use of ultrasound, CT or MRI is of little value in the diagnosis of lymphedema of the extremities.

Diagnostic Imaging

Evidence-based diagnostic radiology.

The radiological community has a long track record of self-examination, starting well before evidence-based medicine came of age. It had to produce such evidence to prove the need for and win funds for its expensive gadgets. The assessment of new tests is easier than proving the value of well-established ones, and in scrutinising the evidence base for an imaging technique a balance must be struck between apparent (eg, diagnostic) benefit and real benefit to the patient. And even when there is a wealth of good evidence healthy debate continues. So radiology may be ahead of some other disciplines in considering the evidence for its daily practice. For example, where is the evidence for the routine clinical examination-and might the radiologist with a chest X-ray and abdominal ultrasound do better?

Diagnostic Imaging