PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 7543321

Contact laser vaporization techniques for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Abstract

Contact laser applications for the relief of bladder outlet obstruction caused by an enlarged prostate are different from the noncontact Nd:YAG laser methods. The noncontact techniques rely on coagulation necrosis or high power-density vaporization. The pure contact Nd:YAG laser allows cutting, coagulation, and vaporization of tissue with minimal penetration beyond the contact surface. In the contact laser prostatectomy technique, the laser probe directly touches and vaporizes the prostatic tissue. This results in immediate removal of the obstructing tissue, in a manner similar to the standard electrosurgical transurethral resection (TURP), and offers the patient the potential for decreased catheter time and a more rapid resolution of symptoms. Our initial experience suggests that the contact technique (contact laser ablation of the prostate or CLAP) may be better suited for the smaller prostate gland (i.e., less than 20-30 g). For prostates larger than 30 g, a newly described procedure known as coagulation and hemostatic resection of the prostate (CHRP) can be used. This method combines initial noncontact coagulation of the prostate with vaporization of a channel. The goal of CHRP is to allow more rapid removal of the catheter with a continued improvement in urine flow secondary to the coagulation effects. The contact laser is specifically designed to vaporize tissue such as the prostate and allows immediate observation of a TUR defect. Improvements in the delivery system and in the size of the contact laser probes have made CLAP a useful modality for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L G Gomella, M A Lotfi, D A Rivas, M B Chancellor. 1995. Contact laser vaporization techniques for benign prostatic hyperplasia.. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1995.9.117

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Laparoscopic gastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection for upper gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: The technique and results of laparoscopic gastrectomy in 110 patients with gastric cancer located in the upper third of the stomach are presented. METHODS: Proximal gastrectomy was performed for lesions in the upper third of the stomach, and total gastrectomy for those that spread over both the upper and middle third. D1 and D2 lymph node dissection was undertaken in patients with T1 or T2 lesions. Anastomosis of the oesophagus was performed intracorporeally using a conventional circular stapling device or a laparoscopic linear stapler. RESULTS: Median operating time was 247 min for proximal gastrectomy and 285 min for total gastrectomy; median blood loss was 207 and 334 ml respectively. A median of 23 lymph nodes was harvested from patients in the proximal gastrectomy group and 34 from those having a total gastrectomy. There was minimal morbidity and fast recovery after surgery. Postoperative recurrence occurred in only one patient, giving a recurrence rate of 0.9 per cent. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic gastrectomy for upper gastric cancer appears to be a safe and curative procedure.

Follow-Up Studies↗

Pyloroplasty with fundoplication in the treatment of combined gastroesophageal reflux disease and bloating.

BACKGROUND: Although gastroparesis does not influence gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or antireflux surgery, many patients with GERD will also suffer from gastroparesis-related bloating as a distinct symptom different from GERD-related symptoms. The purpose of this study was to assess whether a pyloroplasty with a fundoplication will improve bloating symptoms in these patients. METHODS: A prospectively gathered database of all patients undergoing antireflux surgery was reviewed. All patients underwent history, physical examination, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, esophageal manometry, 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, and, selectively, contrast upper gastrointestinal radiography. Patients with symptoms of bloating also underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy. All patients completed the GERD-Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) symptom severity questionnaire. One of the items of this instrument relates to bloating. The item is scored from 0 (asymptomatic) to 5 (incapacitating) based on descriptive anchors. Patients with symptomatic GERD and objective findings by physiologic testing were offered antireflux surgery. Those with delayed gastric emptying (defined as T(1/2) > 120 minutes) were also offered a pyloroplasty. Operations performed included a laparoscopic or open Nissen or Toupet fundoplication with a Heineke-Mickulicz pyloroplasty. Postoperatively, patients completed the GERD-HRQL and had a gastric emptying scintigraphy performed. RESULTS: Three-hundred and sixty-nine patients underwent antireflux surgery; of these, 35 patients also had a pyloroplasty. Twenty-eight (80%) of these patients reported significant symptomatic improvement. The median preoperative bloating score improved from 4 to 1 postoperatively (P < 0.05), and the median gastric emptying scintigraphy T(1/2) improved from 244 to 112 minutes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Although gastroparesis may not contribute to symptoms of GERD, it can contribute to symptoms of bloating. Bloating symptoms improved in 80% of patients with the addition of a pyloroplasty. Therefore, addition of pyloroplasty to a fundoplication in patients with gastroparesis-related bloating can improve bloating symptoms.

Follow-Up Studies↗