PubMed · 7550310
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Burn, T Strachan. 1995. Human embryo use in developmental research.. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng0995-3
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential availability and utility of fetal tissues obtained from spontaneous abortions and from ectopic pregnancies for human transplantation therapy. DESIGN: Tissue collection and analysis by personnel skilled in tissue banking. SETTING: Procurement programs in five tissue banks located in diverse geographical areas that are funded by the National Institutes of Health. PATIENTS: All women entering obstetric clinics during 1993 who consented to participate in the study. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Evaluation of the products of conception by standard developmental, histological, microbiological, and cytogenetic criteria. RESULTS: From 22,235 obstetric admissions, 1250 spontaneously aborted embryos and 247 products of ectopic pregnancies were obtained. Of these, seven embryos (0.5%) were potentially useful for human transplantation therapy. CONCLUSION: Fetal tissues from spontaneous abortions and from ectopic pregnancies are quite limited as feasible sources for human transplantation therapy.
Recent widespread concern has led to legislation in the UK preventing the use of fetal ovarian tissue for the treatment of infertile women. This questionnaire-based study aimed to assess the attitudes of both fertile and infertile men and women as well as egg donors and recipients towards the use of donated eggs for treatment, diagnosis and research. Fertile individuals were significantly less aware of egg donation but the majority in both the fertile and the infertile groups approved the use of eggs for research (89 and 95% of women and 88 and 92% of men respectively) and treatment (similar percentages). However, fetal sources of oocytes were acceptable to only 15% of women in the fertile, 21% in the infertile, 35% in the recipient and 19% in the donor groups. Cadaveric sources of oocytes were slightly more acceptable (28% fertile, 28% infertile, 50% recipient and 42% donors). Both these sources of oocytes were slightly more acceptable to men. Education had little influence on attitudes, although men and women of tertiary education level said they would be less likely to have gamete donation themselves. Thus there would appear to be widespread approval for the use of donor eggs in research and treatment but not if the source of eggs is fetal or cadaveric.
In response to widespread interest by the media, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) recently produced a document entitled 'Donated Ovarian Tissue in Embryology Research and Assisted Conception'. Interested organizations and the public were asked for their views on the use of eggs or ovarian tissue obtained from live donors, cadavers or fetuses for both research and the treatment of infertility. For 6 weeks from mid-March 1994, we made the HFEA document available to women attending a Family Planning/Well Woman Clinic (n = 1142), an Infertility Clinic (n = 241) and 200 women about to have a termination of pregnancy, in an attempt to develop an understanding of the attitudes of the general public. We asked them to answer anonymously the questions posed by the HFEA. Over 89% of women thought that ways should be sought to increase the supply of eggs for research and treatment. There were no significant differences in attitudes between the three groups, except that women seeking an abortion were significantly less likely to support the use of cadavers as a source of eggs for either research (48 versus 67%) or treatment (48 versus 59%) (P < 0.05 in both cases). Although all three groups of women found live donors the most acceptable source (90% for research, 88% for treatment), the majority supported the use of fetal eggs/tissue for both research (60%) and treatment (54%) of infertility. This study represents the first systematic attempt to determine the opinion of women who may not otherwise make their views known to the HFEA.