PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 7566086

Blindsight in normal observers.

F C Kolb·J Braun
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Some patients with lesions in visual cortex lack conscious visual experience but, when tested, exhibit a significant ability, termed 'blindsight', to discriminate visual stimuli. Here we report two different visual displays that induce blindsight in normal observers. Using an objective measure, we show that conscious experience remains defective at presentation times much longer (1 s) than the onset of visual sensitivity (approximately 60 ms). To obtain this effect, we generate a contrast between visual textures and then conceal the contrast by superimposing 'complementary' textures. Complementarity can involve either opposite motion or binocular rivalry and orthogonal orientation. In both cases, observers locate the texture contrast reliably but do not, by either subjective or objective measures, consciously experience it. Taken together with present knowledge of the visual cortical site(s) at which opposite motion and rivalrous orientation interact, this observation bears upon the functional anatomy of conscious visual experience.

Explore related subjects

Contrast SensitivityHumansOptic DiskPsychophysicsVisual CortexJournal ArticleResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

F C Kolb, J Braun. 1995-09-28. Blindsight in normal observers.. https://doi.org/10.1038/377336a0

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1997

How big is a Gabor patch, and why should we care?

We propose a two-parameter model for the perceived size (spatial extent) of a Gaussian-windowed, drifting sinusoidal luminance pattern (a Gabor patch) based on the simple assumption that perceived size is determined by detection threshold for the sinusoidal carrier. Psychophysical measures of perceived size vary with peak contrast, Gaussian standard deviation, and carrier spatial frequency in a manner predicted by the model. At suprathreshold peak contrasts Gabor perceived size is relatively unaffected by systemic noise but varies in a manner that is consistent with the influence of local contrast gain control. However, at and near threshold, systemic noise plays a major role in determining perceived size. The data and the model indicate that measures of contrast threshold using Gaussian-windowed stimuli (or any other nonflat contrast window) are determined not just by contrast response of the neurons activated by the stimulus but also by integration of that activation over a noisy, contrast-dependent extent of the stimulus in space and time. Thus, when we wish to measure precisely the influence of spatial and temporal integration on threshold, we cannot do so by combining contrast threshold measures with Gaussian-windowed stimuli.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1997

Modeling spatial integration and contrast invariance in visual pattern discrimination.

PURPOSE: Human pattern discrimination performance has been reported to be largely independent of stimulus contrast but to depend on stimulus area. The authors propose a model that combines the effects of spatial integration and contrast. The model is based on the computation of similarity between pattern templates in memory and signals to be discriminated using normalized correlation. There are also two sources of additive noise, one before and one after the computation of correlation. The model was compared with human observers in an orientation discrimination task. METHODS: Orientation discrimination thresholds of human observers were measured for sinusoidal gratings of various areas, contrasts, and spatial frequencies. A two-interval, forced-choice methods was used. The performance of the model was determined by using computer simulations. RESULTS: It was found that the effects of contrast and grating area were interrelated. The decrease of orientation thresholds as a function of grating area was considerably larger at low than at high contrast. On the other hand, orientation thresholds decreased clearly as a function of contrast at the smallest grating areas but hardly at all at the largest grating areas. The model accounted well for the experimental findings. CONCLUSIONS: Because the invariance of orientation discrimination with respect to stimulus contrast depended on area, the cause of the invariance appeared to occur after spatial integration. The model explains this so that, with increasing contrast or area, the normalized correlation gradually approached a constant value. The proportion of pretemplate noise became negligible compared to the constant posttemplate noise. Thus, total noise also approached a constant value. Hence, the signal-to-noise ratio and discrimination performance became constant.

Contrast Sensitivity↗